#Gaming with Trolly – Mass Effect Andromeda’s Story mechanics and characters needed a lot of work

Last week, I talked about how Mass Effect Andromeda was plagued with bugs, bad character customization and controversy at the start. With wonky animations at the start, it was real disappointment from the get go. The fact the only way to play a white character was to play default Ryder, and the female character looked like Anita Sarkeesian. . . Well, it was a disappointment, because they should have done much better after the controversy of Mass Effect 3s ending. Today, I am going to talk about the positives and negatives of the story of Mass Effect: Andromeda.

To do this, I’m going to break this all down into three parts. First, will be the conversation mechanics. Second, will be the characters. Next Week, I am going to go over the story as a whole, and individual story lines and my thoughts on them.

This system of Logical, Professional, Casual, and Emotional responses was just fucking stupid. I get they were going with the non-alignment stuff they were going with Dragon Age, but this was fucking stupid. At least Dragon Age felt like there were reasons for your choices, like having special responses for being a type of race or class. This felt completely arbitrary and needed to be completely overhauled. I think the real reason I started to really hate this system was, my fiancé would have OCD panic attacks, worrying about if their Ryder was going to say the right thing all the time. It was infuriating sometimes. These were completely irrelevant choices and felt like they should have taken a lot longer to think about choices and consequences in dialogue.

Since it was all about exploration of a brand new area – how about these conversation options.

1.) Curious – kinda paraphrasing what someone said to get more information from them.

2.) Military – Standing your ground, looking at the initiative’s objectives over the aliens concerns.

3.) Diplomatic – siding with the aliens and trying to ensure their friendship, backing down on things the Initiative would find valuable.

4.) Exploitive – Manipulating someone to get your way, to ensure you get the upper hand on them.

Those sound a lot more appropriate, and you could completely change the game with your conversation choices because those have consequences.

The only time you feel like your decisions do have consequences were different times where you had to decided one thing or the other. I did like these choices, but the other ones felt 2 dimensional at best.

BioWare, you are supposed to be the most premier story telling video game company. When your dialogues choices feel 2 dimensional, your fans are going to be pissed at you. You completely fucked up, and someone like me can come up with better dialogue choices in 2 minutes than your crap ones.

Now, let’s talk characters.

There were some characters I liked. Drax was one of them. His character had real depth. Being a very old Krogan Warrior who has lived 1400 years going around with his shotgun, protecting New Tu’chunka was awesome. I loved playing his story out. Everything was perfect, and I commend the writer who came out with it. Perfect in humour and character.

Peebee was another character I enjoyed, though not as much as Drax. I laughed at how over the top she was, and it was very interesting. Her loyalty mission was perfect as well, the resolution of her past, plus her going after the Remanent tech was awesome and funny.

And then there is Liam. His loyalty mission was the ridiculous quest line I have ever played. It was just perfect.

Yes, they pulled the old Han Solo Star Wars Joke. Just a simple weapon malfunction, LOL! And the fucking argument, that was just perfect. See, complete asshole, before they were about to be spaced.

But the rest of the characters were completely bland. I couldn’t care less about Cora, Ventris was passable, and Jaal’s Loyalty mission had no kick to it.

Basically, the end choice was you were choosing Jaal with and without a scar. Ohhhhh, big consequence there.

It should have been the whole Samaria Vs. Morinth choice again. You can either allow Askkul to kill Jaal, and there would be consequences of that choice, but it would completely discredit the Askkul as the madman he was before the other Roekaar, or you could kill Askkul to save Jaal, and further divide the Roekaar from the rest of the Angara, and really mobilize them against the Initiative, but you save Jaal.

So, they definitely needed to go to the drawing boards on how the told some of the companions stories.

And with side characters, some of the conversation was just fucked up. In the Mass Effect Trilogy, Ashley Williams is your God believing character, and she has depth and interest. When you talk to her about God and the afterlife, the conversation was not cringy as hell, and Shepard could keep her accountable on different occasions when talking about her slight xenophobia over what happened to her grandfather.

Suvi, on the other hand, was so 2-dimensional that I was just pissed off at BioWare. It felt like they tacked on the idea, she’s a scientist who believes in God, like it is forbidden or something. When over 40% of scientists believe in God and an afterlife, I don’t think it is so ‘forbidden’, and I could have written her character 10 times better than what was done, as a person who believes in science and God as well. They murdered the character big time.

Like who says, if you believe in God, why be a scientist? WTF BioWare. That is such a fucking dick move. Either you say I agree, or you completely insult someone by suggesting science and belief in God are mutually exclusive.

And Gil, omg. I couldn’t really stand him at all. I was calling him a fucking cuck every conversation. He was such a fucking beta male it felt like he was wearing the dress in the relationship with Jil. Of course, I think Gil would like to wear dresses.

Callo was cool too, he was the normal and funny Salarian. Great character, that brought a lot of the backstory of the initiative with him.

BioWare definitely needed to work the characters a whole lot more, and the conversation system was completely flat in my opinion.

Have a great day guys and thanks for reading.

Advertisements

Trolly Shitpost Saturday – July 15th, 2017 – Everything from Culturally Appropriating Onesies to Topless women at public pools.

This week was so delicious, with all kinds of irony and just plain stupidity. If you haven’t read my blogs on the Trump Russia story, here’s my last story on it – there are way too many coincidences of the people involved to believe the Donald Trump Jr meeting this Russian Lawyer to believe this was anything but a complete setup by the Democrats.

While all of this important stuff is coming up, there is some real bullshit that is coming out of the world of SJWs that was completely ridiculous this week. I couldn’t stop laughing at some of the shit I was seeing, all completely verified.

Yes, Kid Rock is thinking about going up for a Senate run. Please, Kid, do it. The shit posters of /pol/ will ensure you fucking get in like we shit posted Donald Trump into the presidency. We will do everything to get you into the senate to kick some mother fucking ass.

U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren is sounding the alarm with her Democratic base, warning a Senate run by Detroit bad boy Kid Rock could be the second coming of Donald Trump.

The “Wasting Time” and “All Summer Long” rap rocker-turned-country singer tweeted on Wednesday that he’s running for U.S. Senate in Michigan. Although it’s been largely dismissed so far as a publicity stunt, Warren isn’t taking any chances with the longshot Republican.

“I know a lot of people are thinking: this is some sort of joke, right?” Warren wrote in an email blast with the subject line “Senator Kid Rock (R-MI).”

“Well,” she said, “maybe this is all a joke — but we all thought Donald Trump was joking when he rode down the escalator at Trump Tower and announced his campaign, too.

“And sure, maybe this is just a marketing gimmick for a new album or tour — but we all thought Donald Trump was just promoting his reality TV show, too,” she added.

Looks like the Dems are scared, because they know public opinion for illiberal leftists is at record lows. Especially when 5 seats that were up for election recently all went to Republicans. . . The Dems know they are on the ropes. If Kid Rock really did go up for congress, his kick ass attitude and public persona would make him a sure in for the Republicans.

So, please Mr Rock, Make American Rock Again! #MARA!

Hopefully, with conservatively minded people who want to create a stable and prosperous future are elected to public office, stories that I am about to discuss will happen less and less. Indigenous peoples are upset about a racist onesie being sold in Walmart. Yes, you heard me right, they are upset at a onesie.

Yes, just because this onesie has some Teepee’s on it, the onesie depicts racism and cultural appropriation and filled with colonisation and imperialism. You will not believe the fucking tweet shit storm happened because of this, and it hit the news.

gindaanis (@gindaanis) 2017-07-14, 9:47 AM Found at #NiagaraFalls @Walmart. Where Did you find your #Walmartonesiepic.twitter.com/qJ1PkyQ2Dt

 

datscal (@calwhitejr) 2017-07-14, 10:02 AM Hey @Walmart Have you heard of #residentialschools ? #sixtiesscoop maybe ? This is sooooo inapropriate on soooo many levels #TRC twitter.com/gindaanis/stat…

 

The blow back was so harsh, Walmart has pulled the onesie. If they changed the teepee’s to game controllers, going with the joke that most gamers still live with their parents, I bet gamers wouldn’t have batted an eye, and most gamer parents would have bought the onesie for their kids, laughing all the way.

But the indigenous people colonised, and Canada tried to commit ‘genocide’ on them, with complete tax breaks and complete freedom to fish and hunt at any time of the year. . .

And of course, my friends from the Other 98% didn’t disappoint me. They were all on top of how Trump complimented Macron’s wife. Oh No! That pussy grabbing rapist! He said a woman was beautiful and in really good shape. How dare he enact his patriarchal power over women with the male gaze.

https://www.facebook.com/plugins/video.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FTheOther98%2Fvideos%2F1922080551136247%2F&show_text=0&width=400

They were totally upset that Trump said a woman looked fit and was attractive. What a scumbag sexist rapist he is. I do not get why feminists are getting so sex negative. According to them, cat calling is paramount to rape now, and men who do it should burn in the fiery depths of hell – (Thanks, Laci, I will always remember that clip). Trump literally raped her by saying she was good looking.

I want them to ask a question. If men are not allowed to say how beautiful a woman is, how are there going to be any relationships, and how is the next generation going to be born. It’s almost like they are so sex negative, they want to pull a Julie Bindel.

As a side note, as a NoFapper, that no porn thing would completely backfire on her. The less porn I watch, the stronger I get, and I’m guessing it would do that for many men in the place. . . LOL! The women wardens would soon being fucking all the very strong, confident, and powerful men.

So, fuck off idiots. This culture needs men to pursue women with everything they have, and women to be wooed by these men, so the next generation of children can grow up with a great and loving household.

And talking about men wooing beautiful women, some broad has a case before the Ontario Human Rights board, claiming discrimination because men are allowed to be topless in public pools. That’s right guys, the whole free the nipple campaign is in full stride in Canada.

Woman launches human rights complaint about Cornwall’s toplessness policy at pools

CORNWALL, ONT.—An eastern Ontario city is facing a human rights complaint over its policy on female toplessness in pools, more than two decades after it became legal for women to bare their breasts in public in the province.

Cornwall Mayor Leslie O’Shaughnessy said a woman has complained to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, alleging the pool policy discriminates on the basis of gender.

“Our policy states that girls over the age of 10 must wear a top,” O’Shaughnessy said. “The clause that’s in there is specific to females.”

I’m not going to object to that if women who are in shape come to pools to stay fit and show off. Va, Va, Va, Voom!

But knowing social justice, we’d be seeing land whales invading pools with their naked bodies, and it would drive people from those pools. And I will not gross anybody out with a meme depicting this. I don’t want people to lose their lunch while reading this.

Well, that is my Shitpost Saturday for this week. I’m going to stop Trolly’s week in cancer, and adventures in Idiocracy, as it was just like this anyway.I don’t want to double my work, and I’m starting to need that entire day off, especially writing at least 2 blogs each day.

If you like my blog, feel free to sub to me for more shitpost Saturdays, and work on my web comic, #GamerGate Trolls: Origins.

Sharing this blog on your social media accounts really help me, because the more people who read my blogs, the better I do financially, so please help me and Minds by getting these blogs out there.

Thanks for reading and have a great day guys.

 

Trolly News Update – July 14th, 2017 – Bill 1032 is a Men’s Rights Bill, and the ACLU is lying about it.

A couple of days ago, I read the most outrageous headline. According to CNN, the American Civil Liberties Union were suing Arkansas, saying their 4 new bills pertaining to Abortion forced women who were raped to ask for their rapists’ permission to get an abortion. When people heard about this horrible news, they immediately sided with women, no woman should have to ask a rapist permission to have an abortion, and no rapist should be able to prevent her. I would agree with that, what woman should have to ask permission to get an abortion if she were raped. The whole 5 women out of 1000 women who get abortions because of rape or incest shouldn’t have to ask for abortions for men who raped them.

But does the law really say that? Sure the ACLU, which will be very feminist, is going to virtue signal saying that Bill 1032 is a horrible bill that is going to trample over a woman’s rights. And because certain clauses didn’t outright say it excluded rapists, they had their way to shout from the roof tops. When I heard of the law, I thought, as long as they put in the clause, excluding rapists, this law seems like a Men’s rights bill. Any man who is willing to take care of a child that is biologically his should be able to put forth an injunction and raise the child, even if he is a single father. While the law doesn’t outright say that any man who is biologically the father can do this, it says men married to women. I hope this would include common law marriage, where a man and woman who have been living together for the minimum amount of time can do this.

So, what does the law say? Let me show you.

Bill 1032, the women must ask a rapist if she can have abortion bill.

 20-16-1803.  Ban on dismemberment abortion.

(a) A person shall not purposely perform or attempt to perform a dismemberment abortion and thereby kill an unborn child unless it is necessary to prevent a serious health risk to the pregnant woman.

(b)(1) A person who is accused of violating subsection (a) of this section may seek a hearing before the Arkansas State Medical Board regarding whether the dismemberment abortion was necessary to prevent a serious health risk to the pregnant woman.

(2) The findings of the board are admissible in any court proceedings under this subchapter.

(3) Upon a motion by the person who is accused of violating subsection (a) of this section, a court shall delay the beginning of a trial for no more than thirty (30) days to permit a hearing under subdivision (b)(1) of this section.

This is basically saying, if a woman needs this kind of abortion because of serious health complications, they are excluded from this. But what about rape victims. Will rapists have a legal right to tell women not to have an abortion, according to this law? Well, let’s find out who is liable for the next portion of this bill.

 (c) The following individuals are excluded from liability under this subchapter: abortion;

(1) A woman who receives or attempts to receive a dismemberment

(2) A nurse, technician, secretary, receptionist, or other employee or agent who is not a physician but acts at the direction of a physician; and

(3) A pharmacist or other individual who is not a physician but who fills a prescription or provides instruments or materials used in a dismemberment abortion to the physician or at the direction of the physician.

(d) This subchapter does not prohibit an abortion by any other method for any reason, including rape or incest.

Look at (d) a woman can get any other kind of abortion, and specifically, it doesn’t prevent an abortion for the reasons of rape and incest. This shows the ACLU is completely lying. Women can get an abortion in Arkansas if they are raped, no questions asked. Anybody who says otherwise, any new story that says otherwise is lying to you and is completely fake news.

Now, let’s see how this law protects men’s parental rights as a father.

20-16-1804.  Civil remedies — Attorney’s fees.

(a)(1) A cause of action for injunctive relief against a person who has purposely violated this subchapter may be maintained by:

(A) The woman who receives or attempted to receive a dismemberment abortion in violation of this subchapter;

(B) A person who is the spouse, parent, or legal guardian of the woman who receives or attempted to receive a dismemberment abortion in violation of this subchapter; or

(C) A current or former licensed healthcare provider of the woman who receives or attempted to receive a dismemberment abortion in violation of this subchapter.

(2) The injunction shall prevent the abortion provider from performing or attempting to perform further dismemberment abortions in violation of this subchapter.

Now, here’s the part that the ACLU doesn’t really like. Any spouse, parent, or legal guardian has rights in this law to prevent a woman having this kind of abortion. And because it doesn’t specifically say – that if one of those raped the woman. They are saying, people involved in incest and rape have legal power because of this law, and so I checked a little more to see if they are right.

As a men’s rights advocate, I am applauding this.

For the longest time, if a woman wants to get an abortion, but her partner wants to be a father, she had the power. In Arkansas, they are giving him the ability to place an injunction against this. This isn’t about rapists at all, this is about trying to take away rights from men because this law gives up the right to say, if you don’t want to take care of the child, I will!

So, does a rapist have the ability to prevent a woman from having even that kind of abortion?

(2) Civil damages shall not be awarded to a plaintiff if the  pregnancy resulted from the criminal conduct of the plaintiff.

Geez, what is the only criminal activity in which a plaintiff can cause a pregnancy? I guess a rapist doesn’t have much of a legal leg to stand on. He can’t sue or do anything if a woman who is raped decides to have an abortion. She doesn’t have to ask permission to have an abortion because he can’t say no to it. He doesn’t have the ability to say – no bitch, you must have my child. . .

It even gets worse for a rapist.

(2) If judgment is rendered in favor of the defendant and the court finds that the plaintiff’s suit was frivolous and brought in bad faith, the court shall also render judgment for a reasonable attorney’s fee in favor of the defendant against the plaintiff.

(3) A reasonable attorney’s fee shall not be assessed against the woman who received a dismemberment abortion.

What court in the world is going to not think a rapist suing a woman who got an abortion using this law isn’t bad faith? Can you think of one? Everybody and I mean everybody would be demanding that Judge being disbarred if he or she decided with a rapist.

And the rapist would have to pay for the woman’s legal fees, without any limit. I’d say he would be pretty screwed by this law. But the ACLU is saying otherwise. Any and all coverage of this bill is just fake news. If it sounds too horrible to be true, it is guys.

Stay sceptical, and let’s fight for men’s rights by fighting for this law.

 

Trolly News Update – July 13th, 2017 – The Great Trump Trap.

The left is crazy. In the past couple of days, they are really pressing their smoking gun against Trump, to ‘dethrone’ him. Donald Trump Jr. meet with Natalia Veselnitskaya, a Russian Lawyer who he knew in the past. He received emails saying she would have information proving Hillary Clinton was receiving foreign donations for her campaign, which is against the law. Trump Jr. took the bait and met with her. And now we have impeachment proceedings going forward on Trump, for obstruction of Justice, because he fired James Comey. Yup, it seems like the left is about to win – it’s a solid case, right guys.

Wrong.

Remember the dossier that BuzzFeed published, which detailed how Trump hired Russian prostitutes to piss on him and to piss all over Obama’s bed? Yup, she has ties to that bullshit. She works for the organisation who created that ‘intelligence’ in the first place.

From Russian lawyer who met with Donald Trump Jr linked to investigation group behind salacious Steele Dossier

The Russian lawyer who met Donald Trump Jr and allegedly offered to supply damaging information about Hillary Clinton, is apparently linked to a firm that helped compile the notorious dossier of wild and unproven allegations about the US President.

The President’s eldest son said he met lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, after being told she had information that individuals connected to Russia were funding the Democratic National Committee and supporting Ms Clinton. He said it soon become clear she had no such information and rather wanted to press him about her effort to overturn the Magnitsky Act, a US law that blacklists several Russians linked to the 2009 murder of another Russian lawyer, Sergei Magnitsky.

A spokesman for the President’s legal team told The Independent they now believed Ms Veselnitskaya and her colleagues had misrepresented who they were and who they worked for.

Again, we know they were trying to get information on Clinton receiving illegal donations from the Russians, which would have disqualified her from the presidential race because of her corruption. But this wasn’t a chance meeting, it gets worse.

In a statement, Mark Corallo added: “Specifically, we have learned that the person who sought the meeting is associated with Fusion GPS, a firm which according to public reports, was retained by Democratic operatives to develop opposition research on the President and which commissioned the phony Steele dossier.”

Fusion GPS, which is based in Washington DC and was established by former Wall Street Journal reporters Glenn Simpson and Peter Fritsch, found itself in the spotlight earlier this year after it emerged it was behind an “oppo research” dossier containing unproven and often salacious allegations about Mr Trump.

Fusion GPS was the organisation which created the bullshit that was #GoldenShowersGate, and they are retained by the Democrats.  Mark Corallo is a member of Trump’s Legal team, so when the impeachment proceedings go forward, I think this will turn into an embarrassment for Clinton, because Fusion GPS was retained by Democrats, so it is starting to look like Clinton made up a story to discredit Trump, and manufactured all the evidence to frame him. This is fraud.

Let me prove this. If someone sells a fake gold coin to someone for 500 dollars, saying it is real gold, they have committed fraud. If Fusion GPS brings Veselnitskaya in to create a fake dossier about Trump’s collusion with Russian, to meet with Donald Trump Jr. under the guise that she says she has info on Hillary Clinton – it’s the same thing. I don’t think Hillary will go down, but Fusion GPS is going to be the scapegoat probably.

Veselnitskaya even being able to come into America at the time is highly suspect.

From Curiousier and Curiousier – Natalia Veselnitskaya Pictured With Obama Officials in DC on June 14th, 2016…

It should also be noted that Ambassador McFaul’s friend, Ms. Natalia Veselnitskaya, was initially denied an entry visa into the United States in 2016 and appealed her situation to the U.S. District Court of New York.  She was granted a parole letter allowing her to enter the United States on behalf of a client.

Here’s her filing to the U.S. District Court in New York.

The actual date of the arguments in the case U.S. -v- Prevezon Holdings was the EXACT SAME date as the meeting in Trump Tower – June 9th 2016 CASE LINK

And look at the participating attorneys. A smorgasbord of anti-Trumpers writ large. Attorney(s) appearing for the case:

JACOB W. BUCHDAHL (Cory S. Buland, on the brief), Susman Godfrey LLP, New York, NY, for Movant-Appellant Hermitage Capital Management Ltd.

PAUL MONTELEONI, Assistant United States Attorney (Cristine Phillips, Margaret Garnett, Assistant United States Attorneys, on the brief), for Preet Bharara, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, for Plaintiff-Appellee the United States of America.

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY (Jennifer F. Mintz, Jarrod L. Schaeffer, on the brief), Debevoise & Plimpton, LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellees Prevezon Holdings Ltd., Prevezon Alexander, LLC, Prevezon Soho USA, LLC, Prevezon Seven USA, LLC, Prevezon Pine USA, LLC, Prevezon 1711 USA, LLC, Prevezon 1810 LLC, Prevezon 2009 USA, LLC, and Prevezon 2011 USA, LLC.

So we have a bunch of lawyers who hate Trump, fighting to get someone they are using to discredit Trump the day she meets Donald Trump Jr. That isn’t suspicious at all. Again, this looks like complete fraud, they wanted to manufacture a Trump-Russia collusion because they wanted Hillary in as president.

I can’t wait to see these proceedings, and all of these revelations come out in them. Hillary will probably distance herself from that shit.

Even though, she must be counting on Impeachment. The Clinton Foundation did receive $241.5 million from the Canadian Government. I’m wondering if this means she’s counting on impeachment, and she’s going to try to go up for a rematch again. But when the real details come out, I don’t think she will dare try.

Everything seemed fishy, and now we have enough info, thanks to weaponized autism. We have a real picture of how this all happened. Stay strong my friends, the lies are being exposed as we speak.

If you like my blog, I would love it if you shared this on social media platforms – the more people who read my blog the better for me. And give me a thumbs up above. If you haven’t subbed to me already, why haven’t you?

Thanks for reading and have a great day.

Trolly News Update – July 12th, 2017 – The Donald Trump Jr. Email Scandal Pt. 2

Donald Trump Jr. had to give his emails to the Senate Intelligence Committee, and the Trump Haters are cheering. They have their final smoking gun. The Trump team was colluding with the Russians. We can finally throw them into prison, and we don’t have to have the big bully in the White House anymore. But does the emails really contain damning information that will lead to impeachment and imprisonment?

The email that the Never Trumpers, and the Resistors are using is the one above, where a couple of Russian Nationals may be giving information that would prove Hillary Clinton was breaking the law.

From Trump team met with Russian lawyer during campaign

“After pleasantries were exchanged, the woman stated that she had information that individuals connected to Russia were funding the Democratic National Committee and supporting Ms. Clinton,” Trump Jr. said in the statement. “Her statements were vague, ambiguous and made no sense. No details or supporting information was provided or even offered. It quickly became clear that she had no meaningful information.”

The Irony level is so sweet. I thought Sarkeesian using her platform on online harassment of women to harass Sargon of Akkad was sweet Irony, but the Resistors are saying the Trumps broke the law because they investigated whether Hillary broke the law really tops that cake. LOL! You can’t make this shit up.

From Federal Election Comission – Foreign Contributions.

The Prohibition

The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) prohibits any foreign national from contributing, donating or spending funds in connection with any federal, state, or local election in the United States, either directly or indirectly.  It is also unlawful to help foreign nationals violate that ban or to solicit, receive or accept contributions or donations from them.  Persons who knowingly and willfully engage in these activities may be subject to fines and/or imprisonment.

Who is a Foreign National?

The following groups and individuals are considered “foreign nationals” and are, therefore, subject to the prohibition:

  • Foreign governments;

  • Foreign political parties;

  • Foreign corporations;

  • Foreign associations;

  • Foreign partnerships;

  • Individuals with foreign citizenship; and

  • Immigrants who do not have a “green card.”

So, under the law, If Hillary was receiving money from the Russians, which the meeting was about, they wanted to get evidence of the corruption. They could then take that evidence to FECA, and Trump would have won by default because Hillary would have been disqualified. But no luck, there was no information that they could get. I wanted Trump to win, does this blog mean I am colluding with Trump as a Canadian Citizen, and he is guilty of breaking this law?

So, now these meetings are being called illegal by people who don’t understand the spirit or the letter of the law. They believe that a simple exchange of information is breaking the law. Nowhere in this law does it say anything about information. It is about exchanging funds. If the Trumps and Russians exchanged funds, then they broke the law, like Hillary did. But they didn’t. It was a meeting about information only, no matter how much they want it to be otherwise.

And I do mean, these people want it otherwise.

Opposition information is the same of financial value. Therefore they broke the law. Send the Trumps to the Gulags, this is enough to say that they are guilty of breaking the law, because I say so.

Then the person wants to insult me, lol. What does the fact they were trying to get information on Hillary taking money from the Russians, therefore breaking the law, have anything to do with Trump Jr. being investigated and people saying they broke the law? LOL, omg, I can’t stop laughing at this level of idiocy. Jokes on you idiot.

Like I said, it is more ironic that they are being accused of breaking the law, because they were investigating whether Clinton broke the law. Again, this is a nuffinburger invented by the left to point the finger at the Trumps because they don’t like them and want them impeached. When it comes to nothing, they will probably riot in the streets with Antifa.

I can’t believe how much people want to justify nuffinburgers. Bad Optics doesn’t mean illegal acts morons. It just looks bad, but if really isn’t.

I want to thank everybody who supports my channel. I really appreciate everybody who reads my blogs, who give me a big thumbs up and share my blog with others on the Internet. It really helps me out.

Have a great day guys!

Trolly News Update – July 11th, 2017 – CNN Strikes Back #CNNBlackmail #CNNMemewar

It’s been a week since #CNNblackmail has trended, and thousands of meme warriors have joined the battle, sending jokes at CNN, everything from Trump as Neo kicking CNN’s butt, or Trump as Hulk smashing CNN as Loki’s ass. It’s been glorious.  After the meme war started, Salon.com made the most outrageous claims, that memes were destroying democracy. Memes, jokes, were destroying democracy.

Even my innocent Star Wars Meme.

It was the first hit piece on Internet Culture. CNN is going for the Jugular today, with a story that is sure going to pull at your heart strings, because it is a true story, and it is disgusting. A Jewish woman was doxed and harassed, simply because she tried to reason with Richard Spencer’s mum.

Yes, neo-nazi Idiots went to terrorise Tanya Gersh, for simply suggesting that Spencer’s mum sells her house. But CNN’s timing is suspicious. I’m linking the stories that were published about this most horrific stories before CNN published their article today, instead of over 2 months ago. This story is almost 3 months old. So why now?

I wonder how many more publications are going to publish this story, shouting from the rooftops about how this is exactly like #CNNblackmail. I wonder when CNN itself will talk about #CNNblackmail, tying to this story about how ‘online hate mobs’ need to be routed as they are destroying them?

This is exactly like what happened in #GamerGate. 

Depression Quest awkwardly releases on the day of Robin Williams’ suicide. Not a lot of fanfare on the game itself is had but the Zoe vs Wizardchan story gains more exposure. People begin learning about Depression Quest’s past: When it was in Steam Greenlight, accusations were made that Wizardchan, a forum primarily with men who have deep depression, severe anxiety, and suicidal tendencies, had been framed as harassing Zoe Quinn. These accusations were made by her and reinforced by certain gaming press with no evidence beyond Zoe’s words/writings.

Zoey had the media attack a bunch of men with deep depression and anxiety disorders. You got me right, she attacked a bunch of vulnerable men to get her game noticed. And CNN will use Tanya Gersh to do the same thing. Hey look at these evil fucks attacking us, they are just like those Alt-Right nazi’s who did those evil things to Mrs Gersh.

You find a damsel in distress, you give their story, and you start calling everybody you don’t like a bunch of deplorables. Sexist, Racist, Homophobic deplorables. And now CNN is probably going to hit against all of us because of people we all have disagreed with for a long time.  Heck, I started an Anti-Alt-Right group.

Still, I’ll be lumped into those sick fucks who would terrorise a woman over a difference of opinion. The DailyStormer has been nothing but a steaming pile of shit. I’ve never gone there myself because I don’t think I would appreciate the bullshit. But CNN, deciding to post up a story that is over 2 months old 1 week after we start #CNNblackmail, this is what we are probably going to be compared to. Here go the lies again.

So, the media war just got serious again. The empire of the mainstream media is attacking us rebel forces who refuse to submit to them. They are going to try to punish us again. I hope you guys are ready for the long-term battle between us and them because they are going to demonise us.

Fuck CNN, and fuck their deceptive tactics.

If you like my blog, feel free to sub to my channel for future blogs and updates on my webcomic project #GamerGate Trolls: Origins.

And don’t forget to give me a big thumbs up and share this blog on your social media accounts, it helps a lot.

Have a great day, and thanks for reading!

Trolly Deep Thoughts – I Do Not Have a Gender

Ever since 1955, when sexologist John Money coined the term gender, this world has been turned upside down. He decided, for some arbitrary reason that your sexual organs didn’t determine your ‘gender’. Since then, the slippery slope of people hearing this bullshit idea have come up with some really shitty ideas about ‘gender’. You see, up until 1955, you were either a man or a woman, the noun you used for someone who is either biologically male or biologically female. It was a nice and simple idea – after all you can only be biologically male or female. Keep it Simple, it confuses people a whole lot less.

Ever since this introduction, these ideas have slowly come to the forefront. What used to be a word that was seldom used, is now 90% of conversations of feminists and anti-feminists. So, I have decided I will never use the word ever again when describing myself, I have no gender. I am biologically male, and my noun is man, and my pronouns are he/him/his.

Evidence-based ideas are the only ones that are really worth following. I can measure whether someone has a penis or a vagina. All social sciences are people’s opinions, of people’s opinions of other people’s opinions. How do you quantify that? How is one a Demi-boy? How is one a Demi-girl? How is one agender? How is one non-binary gender?

These are just ideas and opinions floating in someone’s head. It’s certainly interesting when you think of them as that, you can believe you are anything you want to believe. But that is all they are, they are not a gender expression, and just an aspect of something that can be infinite and is also unmeasurable, your consciousness, your personality, your spirit and soul – if you choose to believe in those things. Go celebrate who you are. You don’t have to be a Tall Pansexual Flirty Wood sprite, but if you are that’s cool.

Having a personality is cool, everybody has one, but in my eyes, the whole gender thing is completely tied to personality.

I refuse to accept the idea of gender because progressives are pushing things into the human rights code in my country that may be abused in the future. Sure, there is no way someone could be sued if they ‘misgender’ a person, but if an employer doesn’t hire the person below, it could be abused to say the employer didn’t hire them because of their ‘gender expression’.

So, I will refuse to accept the idea of Gender as it has been explained to me from here on out. If you think there are ‘genders’ and there are ‘gender roles’, I will laugh my ass off. I am a biological male, and my noun is man, and my pronouns are he/him/his.

So, tell me your thoughts on the whole ‘gender’ thing by commenting below? Is it a bogus idea that needs to be wiped, or do you really think that gender is separate from personality, which is also separate from your biological sex?

If you like this blog, feel free to give me a sub, and give me a thumbs up. And don’t forget to share this blog on your social media platforms.

Have a great day, and thanks for reading.