Trolly’s Halloween Shitpost, 2017

Hey guys, let’s Make Halloween Great Again. Let’s take it back from the snot nosed brats who thinks everything is racist, sexist, and homophobic. I’ve been saving some stuff for a while now, and this is going to be one great big politically incorrect blog about how stupid some people have become. So, let’s get started.

From Lili Reinhart Apologizes for “Racially Insensitive” Halloween Costume Photo

Lili Reinhart has apologized for posting what she late called a “racially sensitive” photo of a person in costume.

The 21-year-old Riverdale actress posted on Twitter this weekend a DeviantArt photo she found on Instagram of a woman dressed up as a “demon,” sporting a black bodysuit and black-colored body paint on her face and arms.

“Found my Halloween costume!!” Reinhart wrote. “Inspired by the color of my soul.”

The pic spurred mixed reactions. Some people accused her of wanting to “do blackface.” Others said they did not find the photo offensive. Nonetheless, she deleted the tweet and apologized.

Yes, the social justice brigade were so offended by a woman dressed up as a dark spirit, they had to overrun her Twitter feed accusing her of being a racist monster. I just love that, what does demons have to do with black face.


It kinda reminds me of Kaley Cuoco needing to apologize for saying she wasn’t a feminist, like that is a sin or something, or how Taylor Swift needed to apologize for saying she is not a feminist either. Now Lili Reinhart has to apologize for being ‘racist’ by showing a black face costume, which is not blackface because that is not portraying a black person.

From Urban Dictionary – Blackface.

Enhancing or exaggerating your features and color of skin to represent another race usually in a offensive way.

Sara is really rasist she posted a picture of her fully blackfaced

Since Lili was representing herself a demon, she was not engaged in black face, period. This is levels of social justice retardation that needs to stop right now.
Of course, schools from all levels are now ‘policing’ the kinds of costumes, nothing new here. If you want to be any kind of ‘racially’ insensitive thing, you’re going to be punished in today’s social justice norm. You are not going to believe the ‘dos and don’ts’ the Toronto School board has for tomorrow.

An Ontario school board has sent a checklist to parents before Halloween: Does your child’s costume “represent a stereotype,” such as “terrorist” or “urban ghetto dweller?” Does it involve changing the colour of their skin? Does it allude to a culture that is not the child’s own, such as a kimono, a turban or a feather headdress? Does it “mock” transgender people? Is it based on “tragic or violent historical moments,” such as “slave” or “cowboy and Indian” role play.

First, does it represent a ‘urban ghetto dweller’, their politically correct term for gang member. If someone wanted to dress up as Michael Jackson from the Bad video, they are going to be kicked out?

Second, terrorist, really. Do they think that there is seriously parents who would have dressed their kids like ‘terrorists’. And what if the kid comes in dressed like Antifa, which looks like ISIS, with a few alterations.


And the Kimono, Turban, or Feather headdress, are you kidding me. So kids can’t be passionate about different cultures anymore, in case it offends people?

And ‘mocking’ transgendered people. So if a guy wanted to dress up as a ‘hooker’, a fan favourite, are they in the wrong? And you can’t even be a Cowboy anymore.


Of course, colleges are also doing the exact same things.

From No Fun Allowed: Colleges Complain About ‘Cultural Appropriation’ In Halloween Costumes

Universities are once again promoting the idea that “cultural appropriation” is an actual thing to students need to be aware of–and opposed to. With Halloween just around the corner, the “We’re a Culture Not a Costume” campaign is in full swing.

First started in 2011 by Ohio University students, the campaign has since spread to other schools throughout the U.S. thanks to its proliferation on social media–especially on Tumblr, where users created their own variations of the posters that depicted students of various ethnicities alongside caricatures of their cultures.

The social justice brigade literally takes the fun out of everything. Once upon a time, it was considered offensive if people went out of their way to be offensive while wearing stuff like the feathered headdresses, but now, the mere fact of wearing that, or a Kimono, or even a Cowboy is so offensive, we need to prevent that. It isn’t just the Indian princess, it is a Cowboy now, because he ‘was involved in indigenous genocide’.

This who narrative of ‘Indigenous Genocide’ is getting so ridiculous, any kind of ‘indigenous’ costumes is met with hostility, forcing stores to remove them because social justice warriors threaten boycotts. Walmart cucked themselves this month, by bowing themselves to the ever insatiable social justice fervour.

From Walmart Canada pulls Indigenous Halloween costumes from website

Walmart Canada has pulled a number of Halloween costumes from its website, including “native princess” and “chief,” and will begin a consultation process to revisit its “guidelines that address cultural sensitivity,” CBC Toronto has learned.

CBC Toronto was investigating a complaint about an afro wig for sale at a Greater Toronto Area Walmart and came upon several Indigenous costumes on its site.

Way to go Walmart. The more I look at politics and economics, the more I realize the best thing for Walmart and other stores to do is make a profit. They shouldn’t have any other directive. If I was running Walmart Canada, I would tell the Baizuos that we are not as worried about social justice and being politically correct by keeping the costumes. I love that Chinese slang word Baizuo, it is perfect in describing these morons. They are way too politically correct now.

So, what is the most offensive costume that some could wear? What would make one of these Baizuos scream in horror. Well, one course from the University of Victoria in British Columbia Canada may have the answer.

From GNDR 331 – Queering the Undead

Introduces the concept of “queer” by exposing the similarities between Hollywood monsters and marginalized genders, sexes, and sexualities. Focuses on the term “queer” as both activist and theoretical, and the production of such “undead” characters as zombies, werewolves, ghosts and cyborgs as both constructive and problematic to queer concerns.

Yes, Canadian tax payer’s money is going to a course that explores ‘queer’ concerns about zombies. I agree with Jordan B. Peterson, if this is the kind of ‘academic’ course you take in Gender Studies, it needs to be defunded immediately. This is disgusting.

But it does give the clue as to what the most offensive Halloween costume will be.


She’ll suck your brains out.

Now, if only she had a Indian Headdress and a swastika.

Thanks for reading, and have a most excellent Halloween guys.

Don’t forget to bookmark my page for future blogs.

You can connect with me on Minds.com and Twitter for news and memes updates.

Advertisements

Trolly’s week in Review – 29/10/2017 – Oh what a week.

This week has been one hectic week in politics. So much is happening in the US and Canada; I have to talk about it. In the US, the Russian collusion story is turning out as I predicted. Hillary Clinton and the DNC worked with the Russians to discredit Trump, to get Hillary into the White House. Maybe that’s why Hillary is so ‘convinced’ the Russians are playing games all over the world, she knows from first-hand experience by working with them, lol. Of course, the Russian Collusion story is turning out to be all about Hillary and the Uranium One deal now. Oh, how the tides have changed for her. Of course, the Stephen Paddock case is uncovering all kinds of dirty secrets of his family, including his brother have gigabytes of child porn on his computer. In Canada, we have some really ‘exciting news’, China’s CCCI company just bought the Canadian construction giant Aecon, which built the CN Tower, which used to be the tallest free-standing structure in the world until very recently. Yay, Canada will soon be completely operated by China, it just needs PM JT’s stamp of approval – just after another ‘generous’ Chinese Billionaire gives the Trudeau Foundation a $1,000,000 donation. And PM JT and his pal Finance Minister Bill Morneau are revealing their new spending spree ‘helping’ families after the Conservatives hound them to their dedication to helping the middle class. So let’s all get into this.

From Trump says Clinton camp funding for Russia dossier ‘a disgrace’

U.S. President Donald Trump and other Republicans latched onto revelations tying Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign to a dossier of allegations about his ties to Russia, saying it’s a “disgrace” that Democrats had helped pay for research that produced the document.

“It’s just really — it’s a very sad commentary on politics in this country,” Trump said.

When you have such a corrupt scumbag as Hillary Clinton, who received over a billion dollar in donations from foreign countries in an attempt to win, this is what you get. Hillary is the type of person that so many conspiracies surround, you actually wonder if she’s guilty of them. While we cannot verify any criminal activity yet, if that much smoke surrounds someone, it usually means they are corrupt somehow.

Of course, Hillary’s supporters, and other ‘progressives’ have bought the dossier and the narrative that Trump colluded with the Russians to win the election, have not realised that Hillary paid to produce that dossier. So, how much of it is true or not, because Hillary has a conflict of Interest in paying for that dossier to be created. According to a Republican Senator, there is not one piece of evidence that connects Trump to Russia. And because people are not dropping like flies in regards to this ‘controversy’, I am pretty sure that Trump is innocent. The only reason why we cannot connect Hillary to any crime right now is it seems anybody who is investigating any corruption in the DNC ranks seems to end up ‘committing suicide’ or ends up dead in a robbery attempt. Something smells in Denmark.

Trump addressed reporters one day after news reports revealed that the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee, for several months last year, helped fund research that ultimately ended up in the dossier.

Trump has called the material “phoney stuff” and “fake news,” and on Wednesday he portrayed himself as the aggrieved party, posting on Twitter a quote he said was from Fox News that referred to him as “the victim.”

It was phoney. Russian Hookers peeing over a bed that Obama slept in, and peeing over Donald Trump? We called the Dossier #PissGate for a reason. It was completely fake, entirely made up. It was like some 12-year old was going wild, writing some weird porn-induced story about women pissing all over the place. I can’t believe BuzzFeed published it. BuzzFeed, you’re a bunch of morons.

I can’t believe we are still going on this. It’s practically one year after President Trump was elected. I think this is going to be Trump’s Obama’s birth certificate thing. Democrats and their allies around the world are going to hold onto this throughout his entire presidency, like Republican’s and their partners did about Obama’s BC. This narrative does nothing but cement division, and it needs to die.

More importantly, as we learn that it was Hillary paying Russian Agents and others to create that dossier, we are looking into her other connections with Russia, the Uranium One Scandal.

From Hannity: Uranium One Deal ‘One of the Biggest Scandals in American History’

Sean Hannity reacted to breaking news that the non-disclosure agreement with an informant privy to information involving the Uranium One deal was lifted.

The agreement, similar to a gag order, prevented the individual from discussing what he knew with Congress and others.

He said that Senate Judiciary Chairman Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) is now calling for a special counsel to probe the Uranium One deal.

“The media has been wrong about the Trump-Russia collusion for over a year,” Hannity said.

“America’s national security was sold out,” he said, calling the deal one of the “biggest scandals in American history involving another country.”

“People… will need to go to jail,” he said.

No matter how people want to say this isn’t a ‘big deal’, allowing foreign nationals to buy huge parts of our countries industries is a big deal. The amount of money that was going to the Clinton Foundation has been corroborated by the New York Times.

But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

The NYT wouldn’t be posting up a story that would make Hillary Clinton look like she was involved in pay to play politics if it wasn’t the truth.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totalling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

Yes, millions of dollars were spent to wine and dine the Clintons during the Russians purchase of Uranium One. It’s time to realise that Hillary had more significant connections to the Russians than Trump ever did. The fact that everybody investigating Hillary and the DNC ends up dead, and nobody investigating Trump has ended up dead speaks volumes to the characters of these two individuals, because all signs point to Clinton’s corruption, even if there is no evidence of her crimes yet.

Trump is doing a great job dismantling the fake media who give Hillary a pass. But what about the Stephen Paddock case Trolly? It’s almost a month since the massacre, do they know more yet.

Well, yes and no. It seems Stephen’s brother was a paedophile with a penchant for child porn.

From VEGAS SHOOTER STEPHEN PADDOCK BROTHER ARRESTED FOR CHILD PORN

The brother of Vegas shooter Stephen Paddock has been arrested for child porn … TMZ has learned.

Bruce Paddock was taken into custody moments ago in North Hollywood, CA at an assisted living home.

Law enforcement sources tell us … cops were tipped that there was child porn on his computer and they got a search warrant. Our sources say the investigation began before his brother, Stephen, shot up the Vegas music festival earlier this month.

Yeah, the way Bruce went on during the beginning of this investigation, you’d think that Stephen was the ‘black sheep’ of the family, but it seems the entire family was involved in some profoundly criminal and disgusting behaviours behind the scenes. In my research into this kind of stuff, sometimes it may be just one person in the family, but often, the entire family is corrupt.

Some families, like the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and it seems the Paddocks, are entire families you need to be cautious around. When you have two bad seeds in the same generation, it’s the family, and if you only have one bad seed, it’s that individual.

As with all things, the more powerful you become, the more corrupt you become. I’m hoping Donald Trump is not the same, but corruption and power usually go side by side. Up here in Canada, Prime Minster JT and gang are trying to buy votes, while he will make China’s take over of Canadian industries go unchecked.

From Liberals intend to raise Canada child benefit, officials tell CTV News

The Liberals introduced the $22-billion Canada child benefit (CCB) program in July 2016. It gives families with children under the age of 18 a monthly payment, the amount of which is tied to income.

The CCB currently pays up to $6,400 per child under the age of six, and up to $5,400 per child for those aged six through 17. However, the amount of money begins to decrease once a family’s net income reaches $30,000.

Since the Conservatives have been going hard on Trudeau’s tax reforms that hurt small businesses, and people living with Type 1 Diabetes and other mental health conditions, Trudeau had to come up with something to make people happy. Money always seems to do it, so they are deciding to bribe votes out of Canadians by increasing the Canada child benefit, increasing the spending on an already $22-Billion program.

From Federal Liberals To Raise Canada Child Benefit In 2018

The increase will mean an average Canadian family with two children will see around $200 more in 2018, and around $500 more in 2019, “We want to do a little bit more for middle class families through the Canada Child Benefit, just to make sure that it keeps up with inflation.  That is really important to us.  By increasing the tax credit for the individuals and families that are at that low income level,  it will have a real impact on them and they are going to put that money back into the economy.  So it’s really doubling down on a strategy that has worked,” Morneau says.

Increasing the benefit is a total ‘vote grab’. But if you think about this, it’s almost like the Liberals want people dependent on the government. With the new tax reforms, trying to develop your own small business is hampered and now you have to rely on the government more with the child benefits to make ends met. The more the government offers programs like this, the more reliant we will become on the government, and that can have a negative impact on the growth of individuals and families.

Plus, I can see many people who would want to immigrate to Canada who comes from countries which have larger families, just because of all the money that Trudeau is trying to spend on people making families. The fact Canada is $28.5 billion in debt, how much more does he want to spend?


And while all of this is happening, China has bought yet another major Canadian corporation for the tune of $1.5 billion. While the Harper government would have put China through hoops and fire to make that deal happen, because he had a Canadian Business first strategy, people expect they will have a much friendlier time of approval under Trudeau.

From Aecon takeover expected to get warmer reception from Ottawa

China’s CCC International $1.5 billion takeover of Calgary-based construction company Aecon Group Inc. may benefit from the Liberal’s softening tone on foreign takeovers

Yeah, softening the tone, I like that.

It seems that Trudeau’s philosophy, if you give the Trudeau foundation significant cash donations, the sales of major Canadian corporations becomes much more comfortable. So, I expect that Prime Minister JT will be making this take over very easy. Our Canadian Heritage is being sold from under our feet by a very greedy pay to play politician. Hopefully, his Teflon has been damaged enough by the Bill Morneau conflict of interest scandal.

The takeover of Calgary-based construction company Aecon Group Inc. by China’s CCC International for $1.5 billion will face scrutiny from Ottawa, including a test of whether the sale provides a “net benefit” to Canada.

But it is unlikely to have to weather the bumpy and ultimately frustrating ride experienced by other foreign investors in recent years, thanks to a softening tone from the Liberal government of Justin Trudeau.

A handful of foreign takeovers subjected to such probes under provisions of the federal Investment Canada Act were rejected by the previous Conservative government of Stephen Harper — notably the attempted acquisition of Saskatchewan’s Potash Corp. by Anglo-Australian mining giant BHP Billiton Ltd.

Yeah, I didn’t know how much good Harper was doing for Canada. I feel sorry for voting against the Conservatives during this election because it was Trudeau that was the snake in the grass. Hopefully, Andrew Scheer will come in and save Canada’s industries from Chinese takeover. I don’t want Canada to be controlled by an utterly dictatorial power, for the simple reason China is worth much more than Canada due to the sheer size of its population. It seems right now if a Chinese Billionaire wants to buy a Canadian company, Trudeau is giving it the green light.

Canada will not be able to stand on its own industries if this keeps on happening. We need a great Canadian Dream that focuses on rewarding people for hard work and determination.

Thanks for reading this week in review guys, and have a great week.

Just to let you guys know, I just got a job, and so my blogging schedule will drastically change as of tomorrow. I will not be putting up a blog every single day anymore, these puppies take 3 hours to write, edit, and distribute. What I promise to you will be at the minimum my week in review, and Shitpost Saturday. If I have time, I will do a blog on something that breaks that I feel that time is of the essence. I want to focus my time on two personal projects after I get home from work.

You should bookmark my home page, or you should sign up to the email follow list, to see when I put a new blog up.

And if you could share this blog on social media by using the buttons at the bottom of this blog, it will help me out.

I will still spend a fair amount of time on Minds.com, and I will be sharing news stories on my profile there, as I find them. You can also contact me on Twitter, sharing the news as well.

Trolly’s Shitpost Saturday – 28/10/2017 – A massive week of apologies

I feel sorry for normies. In my mind’s eye, the culture war between 5 percent of the population who have drunk the cultural marxism kool-aid vs 5 percent of the population that can see what is happening, because we research things like critical theory and Marxism. Normies just want to live out their lives, but because the forces of Marxism are always moving the goal posts, normies are continually changing. This week those normies have been apologising for a lot of things, things they don’t even need to apologise for, so let’s get through this Shitpost Saturday.

From Kellogg’s apologizes for cereal box showing lone brown corn pop as janitor

Novelist Saladin Ahmed was looking at the back of a Corn Pops cereal box when he noticed a small but jarring detail.

The colourful illustration on the box depicted a chaotic scene of little yellow corn pop characters frolicking through a shopping mall.

But in the middle of the drawing, Ahmed spotted a lone non-yellow corn pop. The character looked as if it had brown skin. It also happened to be the only corn pop in all blue, and appeared to be waxing or scrubbing the mall’s floors.

Wow, a jarring detail. The only brown corn pop was gainfully employed, going about cleaning a mall while a bunch of white privileged corn pops were enjoying their time. People being offended that there is only one brown corn pop is what social justice has become. Let’s just focus on the colour of ‘corn pop’ characters.

That box of corn pops is not ‘diverse’ enough, you racist bigots. Kellogg’s better get on its knees to pray for forgiveness, right Saladin?

If the box was all yellow, I guess social justice would be upset that it was all yellow, and if it has one fictional character who is brown, doing a job, that’s also racist, we need more diversity, Nazi! I can’t believe people are getting this upset over nothing.

On Wednesday morning, Ahmed tweeted to Kellogg’s: Why is “literally the only brown corn pop on the whole cereal box the janitor?”

It’s “a tiny thing,” he added, “but when you see your kid staring at this over breakfast and realize millions of other kids are doing the same. . .”

Oh yes, kids are being turned into Nazi’s on a daily basis because they see only one brown corn pop, working in a mall, as a janitor. We can’t have that level cultural insensitivity because those neo-nazi monsters are going to hate brownies. We must reach peak people of diversity levels on everything, for proper representation in every media. A brown corn pop janitor is too demeaning.

The Chinese have a word for social justice warriors, and I like it. It’s Baizuo, and it means, people who are too concerned with political correctness. I wonder if that is the reason they called Prime Minister JT a little potato, seeing him virtue signal that ‘diversity is our strength’, and ‘poverty is sexist’.

But this hegemony of cultural Marxists forces normies to continually bow down and cuck themselves, even over stupid things. With everything that has been going on with the Harvey Weinstein mess, men are coming out of the woodwork, confessing their great sins, like complimenting a woman on how they look. This week, I saw the owner of one of the most prestigious restaurants in Ottawa begging people to forgive him for ‘sexually harassing’ three women by ‘complimenting them on how they looked’. Yes, you’re reading that right.

From Prominent Ottawa Restaurant owner Matt Carmichael apologizes for sexual harassment incidents

Prominent Ottawa restaurant owner and chef Matt Carmichael admits to sexually harassing women with inappropriate comments.

Carmichael issued a statement today to explain that he’s been in therapy for drug and alcohol rehabilitation since June 2017.

Carmichael is co-owner of successful Ottawa restaurants in Ottawa including El Camino, Datsun and Riviera.

When he says, he was harassing women, it was commenting on how three different women looked while he was inebriated. Watch the entire clip. The way the interview was taken so seriously, over a man saying something about how three women looked, is disturbing. Sexual Harassment use to mean, ‘person of the opposite sex, do me a favour, and you get to keep your job’. I’m sure Matt never went that far, but he’s apologising now. And the fact he has given settlements to all three women is beyond me. What has feminism done to gender relations, if a man is paying three women to keep quiet for commenting on how they looked?

I’m going to be honest, I’m do know that it is the rehab that is probably pushing him to do this. When you are addicted, you always feel guilty for the things you do during recovery. Add feminism, in this day and age; he feels guilty that when he was a little inebriated, he told some female colleagues they looked lovely – because ‘men are oppressive’ when they tell women ‘they look nice’. It is putting the power dynamic on women instead of focusing on equality. I can’t believe how far Matt is going by apologizing.

Matt, let me give you a piece of advice, you did nothing wrong. It is not sexually harassing to tell someone they look nice in 2017, even if you say ‘damn girl, you look hot’. You don’t need to beat yourself up for saying stuff like that. Just focus on the real damage you caused while you were drinking and doing drugs, not ‘I must have offended those three women’, who thought this was so important that they never said anything about it. I am just learning about this, so there wasn’t some controversy about this.

Like I said, cultural Marxists always move the goal posts. On one day, something is okay, and on the next day, it is the most significant sin of sexism, homophobia or racism, which brings me to my next shit post.

From A Halifax councillor will now refuse to use the word ‘marijuana’ because he says it’s racist against Mexicans

Coun. Shawn Cleary’s comments prompted a Twitter firestorm, including comments from a fellow councillor: ‘Only in Canada can you smoke it but not say it.’

Yeah, that’s a thing in Canada. Don’t use the word Marijuana, because it’s racist. This story has to be the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. Is it because Juan is in Marijuana? That is so evil; we must use something different, like, I don’t know weed. But from here on out, because Marijuana is racist, I’m going to use it on purpose. I love me some Marijuana because I’m a racist, nazi loving white supremacist!

HALIFAX — A Halifax councillor says he will no longer use the term “marijuana” because it is racist, sparking a social media debate over the well-used synonym for cannabis.

Coun. Shawn Cleary said a police officer he works with on a cannabis legalization task force recently brought it to his attention that the term has a racist history.

Cleary said in the early 1900s during the criminalization of cannabis in the U.S., “marijuana” was used to demonize marginalized communities, namely Mexicans.

You don’t say. It was used an ‘insult’ for marginalized communities, like Mexicans. I couldn’t have guessed that is why it is racist. I guess we shouldn’t use Mary Jane either because Mary Jane is derived from Marijuana too. Social Justice turns everything into racism, and that’s why I can’t take it seriously anymore. Everything needs to be ‘purified’ from any ‘racist’ roots it may have when white people use it.

But we can be called Crackers, Nazis, Klansmen and many other racist terms by any other group and even white people, but that is okay. It’s shit like this that is creating the alt-right assholes. The more racist you become to white people, the more you attack white people, and the more retarded you move the goal posts, the more people will want to be alt-right because they hate this shit.

Personally, I like multi-culturalism and experiencing the literature, concepts, and food of as many different cultures as possible. I’m a ‘white voyeur because I think that is the best way to experience multi-culturalism.

He said after doing some of his own research on the term’s origins, he decided to stop using it, saying earlier this week on Twitter: “Let’s do what we can to not perpetuate racism.”

You can call it whatever you want, but I am going to make sure I use the word Marijuana now because it offends you. It means nothing to me, but I will use it because you are being retarded. Almost any kind of slang has had a ‘colonial’ history to it. Canada is not a racist country, though the more social justice pushes, the more we will push back. Moving the goal posts on a continual basis, forcing people to prove they are not ‘racist, sexist, homophobic’ is messed up.

And now certain terms have even become problematic for the newer generation. If you didn’t know, don’t call people Millennials now. It’s offensive to them. Yeah, you heard me right, it’s offensive. Boo Hoo.

From Liberal government advised not to call young people ‘millennials’ lest they be insulted

A $54,000-study conducted in March found that young people aged 16 to 30 thoroughly resent how they’re labelled

First, fuck off spending that money, Trudeau. I could have told you that without a $54,000 study.

Second, they should resent how they are labelled. Millennials are the worst generation that has ever been in existence. They live in a dreamland where you can’t be offensive to anybody. In this generation’s eyes, almost anything can be racist, like calling weed Marijuana and only having one brown corn pop on the box, or sexist, like telling three women you think they are attractive (though Matt is not a millennial, that’s on them for forcing feminism to that extreme).

That is why Generation Z is becoming so conservative. They see the shit that these extremes cause, and are choosing the exact opposite of them. Millennials are the cry bully generation. They start crying, and demand school officials to prevent Milo Yiannopoulos, Ben Shapiro, Anne Coulter from speaking, and are salty they get book deals. So it is only natural that the next generation rebel against that, and seek more conservative way of life, seeking out tradition.

OTTAWA — Don’t call young people “millennials,” because they find the term offensive, the federal government has been told.

In focus groups conducted for Employment and Social Development Canada, researchers determined earlier this year the word elicits “strong negative connotations” and is “considered derogatory and insulting to this generation.”

Less than a month later, however, the department posted on its website an infographic, complete with a motif of a baby next to a tablet, called “Understanding & Attracting Millennials.” A list of “millennial traits” on the graphic includes that they’re “tech natives,” “socially responsible,” “want to actively participate” and “want to be heard.”

Yes, we have hit full retardation. Saying Millennial is offensive, because of generation ‘snowflake’. I wonder, what I should call them – Millennial Snowflakes, Snowflakes, or Millennials, seems all these terms are of equal opportunity to insult them.

Well suck it up buttercup, you are ruining the planet, you morons.

And you’ve got to see this infographic, it’s hilarious.


I love the last one; they want to leave their comfort zones. Generation ‘Safe Space’, who wants to cleanse all ‘racism, sexism, and homophobia’ wants to ‘leave their comfort zones’. LOL!

Yes, they want to be heard, and only their views are allowed. If you have any conservative perspective, they want it silenced, because it hurts their feelings. If you’re going to protest abortion, they will attack you, and now you can’t protest abortions within 50 meters of an abortion clinic in Ontario, all because of Millennials. They want to be heard, and silence everybody else, because, for some reason, we are not ideologically pure. Fuck their ideology.

They call themselves, socially responsible, but they are creating a hegemony of political correctness that everybody is afraid of going against, as they are taught by their Marxist professors and teachers in the schooling system. They, and only they should be able to participate in social activities because anybody with a different point of view must be silenced and prevented from engaging with society. They are a force doesn’t know the word no, and that is why Millennials went out of their way to cause massive riots after Donald Trump won the 2016 election.

Well, that’s Shitpost Saturday for this week.

Thanks for reading, and have an awesome week guys.

If you could use the share buttons at the bottom of this blog, it helps me reach new readers, and I would appreciate it. And if you haven’t bookmarked my home page, it is the easiest way to see what my next blog will be.

Minds.com is the best place to support my work and get a hold of me because I am there multiple times a day to check what’s going on. You can also contact me on Twitter.

Trolly News Update – Oct. 27th, 2017 – The war on Men – the Myth of Rape Culture

In a world in the ‘full Weinstein’ effect, Feminist hysteria has hit all-time new heights. In that backdrop, especially the #MeToo campaign, I knew someone was going to pick this story up. Yes, in Canada there is a ‘stats’ story that is so outrageous, it needs to be talked about because it is that off. Like Bearing corrected the girl who said there is one rape every six seconds in the United States, which is 26 times the real rate of rape in the US, I have to deal with an ‘expert’ who is constantly trying to peddle her story where Canada is a rapist’s wonderland, when it is not true. Welcome to the world of Holly Johnson.

From One in five sexual-assault cases go to court, study finds

Just one in five sexual assault cases substantiated by Canadian police end up in court, with about one in ten resulting in a conviction, according to a new study by Statistics Canada.

The findings, released on Thursday, mark the first time the statistical agency has followed sexual assaults reported by police in a national crime survey all the way through the justice system, tracking their rate of “attrition.”

The fact that such a large proportion of alleged sexual assaults dropped out of the system between 2009 and 2014, the six-year window studied by Statscan, points to a national failure of criminal justice, University of Ottawa criminology researcher Holly Johnson said.

First, my heart goes to all the women and men who go through the trauma of rape. When people use sex as a weapon, it brings great harm to every single person it happens too. So, to use people who get raped as a political tool to promote more ‘feminism’ just pisses me off.

The problem is how much evidence the police can gather to prove their case. If a woman waits years to report a sexual assault or rape, how do we get the DNA evidence that will convict the rapist? And what if the rapist is careful and uses a condom to have sex to minimise that kind of evidence. That lack of evidence makes it difficult to proceed.

And when the victim, law enforcement and the justice system work together, it can become he said she said theatre, and it all comes down to personal testimony, muddying the waters, which makes connections very difficult. I know in your feminist ideology, it is guilty until proven innocent, listen and believe the victim. I always like the trust and verify approach in these circumstances, because the most important thing for the justice system to do is to protect the innocent from any harm.  I know that social justice wants to turn the justice system upside down, ensuring all rape allegations see all men imprisoned, but we need to remember what our justice system is meant to protect the innocent.

“I think that’s an enormous problem. I think that points to a failure on the part of the criminal justice system to provide a reasonably just response to a very serious violent crime,” she said.

The Statscan report comes amid mounting global attention to the prevalence of sexual assault and harassment, and the often inadequate police response to those issues. A Globe and Mail investigation has revealed that Canadian police forces are dismissing one in five sexual assault cases as “unfounded,” – or baseless – and has prompted a wave of reform at the local and federal levels.

Well, Holly, if you live in the world where the justice system protecting the Innocent is more important than punishing criminals, I don’t see our system having a problem. Do you understand the price of false rape allegations? Jay Cheshire hung himself after being falsely accused of rape, his mother also committed suicide. All because of the hysteria that is caused by false rape allegations. False rape allegations is a uniquely male problem, and this is why John Adams, and so many other people who wanted to create a fair justice system, wanted to avoid. But the hegemony of feminism only knows hate, and will never forgive men and will never be thankful for a freedom loving justice system.


The ‘unfounded’ cases may be higher than any other crime because it is that easy to murder someone with a false rape allegation. And I do mean murder. Any woman or girl that outright falsely accuses a man of rape that causes two deaths, their blood is on the hands of the girl who accused Jay of raping her. She’s a murderer because the cultural Marxist feminist ideology wants to see all men punished this way because the ‘patriarchy’ ensures men are privileged who are oppressing women . With a price that high, we have to make sure that false rape allegations do not find the light of day. False rape allegations kill people in the worst case scenario and almost always ruin people’s lives.

The attrition figures do not include sexual-assault allegations that are treated as unfounded, in part because Statscan did not track those reports between 2006 and this year.

The figures also exclude the overwhelming majority of sexual assaults that are never reported to police. It is estimated that only 5 per cent of sexual assaults in Canada are reported to police. Given these gaps in the data, Dr. Johnson noted that the number of sexual assaults that result in criminal convictions is much lower than the study could capture.

“We’re starting with 4 per cent of all sexual assaults,” she said. “The biggest attrition is when women don’t report. So encouraging women to report is fruitless unless we improve the system for them.”

Of the 93,501 police-reported sexual assaults covered by the study, 79 per cent did not end up in court, either because charges were never laid, or those charges were dropped before reaching court.

Now, we’re going into the funky, unattributed math. How can we know the number of sexual assaults in Canada if they are never reported to the police or the authorities? What kind of sexual assaults are we talking about as well? Some guy giving the name of ‘Hugh Mungus’ is not sexual assault or harassment, no matter how much the feminist hegemony wants to say they are.

Second, how do we know? You say only five percent of women report their sexual assault or rape, Holly. If we do the math here, that would mean that over a six-year period, the adjusted figures beginning with the 93,501 reported sexual assaults. If we add the extra 20% the police did not investigate that is ​​112,201. Then if we truly believe your only 1 in 20 get reported, we are talking 2,244,024 women were raped and sexually assaulted in a six-year period, and that means around 14 percent of Canadian women in that six-year period. If we keep doing the math, every woman will be raped in Canada in a 42-year period.

Well, my Fiancé and her mother was never sexually assaulted, and my mother and aunt were never sexually assaulted to my knowledge, so your stats are bogus. You can make up stats all you want; women are not being raped that much Holly. Maybe in Islamic countries, but not in Canada. Stop making stats up, you’re suppose to be a criminologist and I’ve just debunked you.

Furthermore, if Rape and Sexual assault were that high, why is the number of abortions for rape victims very low. Do you believe that women’s wombs magically shut themselves down to prevent pregnancy when they are being raped, like Rapepublicans?

From Rape-related pregnancy: estimates and descriptive characteristics from a national sample of women.

RESULTS:

The national rape-related pregnancy rate is 5.0% per rape among victims of reproductive age (aged 12 to 45); among adult women an estimated 32,101 pregnancies result from rape each year. Among 34 cases of rape-related pregnancy, the majority occurred among adolescents and resulted from assault by a known, often related perpetrator. Only 11.7% of these victims received immediate medical attention after the assault, and 47.1% received no medical attention related to the rape. A total 32.4% of these victims did not discover they were pregnant until they had already entered the second trimester; 32.2% opted to keep the infant whereas 50% underwent abortion and 5.9% placed the infant for adoption; an additional 11.8% had spontaneous abortion.

Those rape stats may be from the United States, but how far would they be off for Canada. With 3,000,000 pregnancies, an estimated 32,101 were rape-related, and 16,000 were aborted. Of the 664,435 reported abortions to the CDC, only 2.5 percent of abortions are due to rape. I would imagine the same stats in Canada, or about 1,600 rape-related abortions every single year. When you imagine the 32 thousand can compare it to the 3 million pregnancies, we are talking about 1 in every 100 pregnant women are pregnant because they got raped. If every single woman in Canada were sexually assaulted in a 40 year period, the amount of rape pregnancies would be much higher?

When you look at these numbers, there is not a rape problem in the general populace, and more importantly, when you see what kind of rapes are involved, it seems like many are the result of statutory rape and incest with family members, according to the study. If a family member isn’t physically and sexually abusing you, most women are probably never going to experience sexual assault in their life.

CONCLUSIONS:

Rape-related pregnancy occurs with significant frequency. It is a cause of many unwanted pregnancies and is closely linked with family and domestic violence. As we address the epidemic of unintended pregnancies in the United States, greater attention and effort should be aimed at preventing and identifying unwanted pregnancies that result from sexual victimization.

First, as they stated, there are only 32,101 pregnancies related to Rape in the US, so it is not an ‘epidemic’ by any means. There are lots of ‘epidemics’ that aren’t like H1N1, SARS, West Nile, etc., etc., etc.

Second, the study itself first says most of the rape-related pregnancies are adolescent girls, and a relative is the one who is raping the girl, meaning most of these unwanted pregnancies caused by rape are within the family. That pedo uncle is an urban myth for a reason. The vast number of men are not raping women, but a certain few are, and we need to do something about those levels of rape in our culture, which happen because of sociopaths and psychopaths.

The numbers do not support your conclusion, Johnson, so you should drop the 1 in 20 are not even brought to the police thing. That is creating a hysteria that completely puts fear in both men and women from doing what comes naturally, building relationships, marriages and families. How many men and women are hesitant of taking a big step by talking to a member of the opposite sex that they think is attractive because they are afraid of the rape myths that you are perpetuating?

When the amount of rapes have been going down in the past 20 years in all of our cultures, this rape hysteria needs to disappear.

Thanks for reading guys, and have a great day.

If you want to get a hold of me and find out about all the stuff I am working on, Minds.com is the best place to go, because I am there multiple times a day to check what’s going on, and I put everything I am working on there. You can also contact me on Twitter.

If you like this blog, make sure you share this on your social media feeds by using the buttons below.

Don’t forget to bookmark my home page to ensure you can find out what I am going to be blogging about next.

Trolly News Update – Oct. 26th, 2017 – Ontario uses ‘gender-equality’ to deny free speech

If you watch Yuri Bezmenov’s videos, the idea Marxists go about to subvert and demoralise a country through a series of crisis is an absolute thing to understand. When you look at that and apply the fundamental tenets of critical theory, social engineers set segments of the population against each other in a worldwide game of chest where ‘privileged’ people vs people of ‘diversity’. Once Hollywood started to broadcast these messages into our homes through TV and movies, it has done nothing but set brother, sister, father and mother against members of their own home. In the recent two years, this conflict has become so strong, violence has erupted, first from the left in the riots protesting the Nov. 8th election results, and throughout this year with Charlottesville being the prime example of the heightened conflict between Marxists and Fascists, and now anybody who espouses any conservative view. With this heightened sense of conflict between the Marxists and Anti-Marxists – Antima for short, or AntiCom if you want to be literal – Anti Communists, all kinds of things gets implemented. Today, in the name of ‘gender-equality’ protesting at an abortion clinic is now a criminal offence. Yes, people who hurt the feelings of women wanting abortions are guilty of a crime now. Thanks, Kathleen Wynne.

From Ontario makes it illegal to protest outside and near abortion clinics

It will soon be illegal to protest outside and near abortion clinics in Ontario.

The legislature passed a bill Wednesday to create zones of between 50 and 150 metres around the eight clinics in the province, in which anti-abortion protests, advising a person not to get an abortion, and intimidation or interfering with a woman’s ability to access the services will be banned.

Again, I have never heard about any altercations that have happened near abortion clinics. They are using ‘protect women’ dialogue as a clever tactic to create tension between people. Every single day, if you check, your rights are being eroded by the government. Whether we are accused of hate speech when it comes to talking about Islam, the Transgendered push on children, and today, speaking out against abortion, Canadian’s are losing their right to speak the minds of on controversial topics like abortion, Islam, and immigration. Thanks, Kathleen, for creating such an intolerant ‘tolerance’.


I’ve said it, in the new leftist world, there is no choice but pro-choice, and if you have a different opinion, shut up. Whether the Leftist world decides that a pro-life voting woman can’t be the chair of the Status of women committee, or you are mandated to vote for Pro-Choice in all abortion matters, or it is this 50 meter ‘safe space’ around all abortion clinics because non-existent intimidation happens there, the government is violently denying pro-life voices. As a libertarian, if your idea needs force to prevent dissent than it is not worth implementing.

Attorney General Yasir Naqvi cheered that all three parties worked together to pass the legislation on a sped-up timeline.

Of course Patrick Brown is cucking himself for the Marxist forces in my government. He has to virtue signal that ‘he’s with the ladies’ because feminism has replaced religion as the ‘moral compass’ of our world. You can’t have a ‘moral compass’ that is constantly moving all over the place, because every time it shifts, it will deny more people their rights. Today, they passed a bill to silences Pro-life voices by preventing any protest within at least 50 metres of abortion clinic. What’s next, online, because you know whatever bill they use to create a safe space online may include ‘protecting women’s issues’.

It is going to be a battle to slowly take back our culture because people are under the false illusion that the way our culture works is right. It needs every single blogger, video maker and demonstrator to fight this. The hegemony that Marxists have created though feminism is almost absolute. Most people are intimidated into saying ‘I’m pro-choice and I’m a feminist’ because they know they will be bullied online if they say anything different.

We only need to look back to #GamerGate to see how people like Anita Sarkeesian, Zoey Quinn, and Brianna Wu acted towards people who oppose them. They doxx them, they harass them, and they attack their opponents on a constant basis. Whether you are Kaley Cuoco, Taylor Swift, or the numerous people who go out and attack women for having the ‘non-feminist’ ideas and positions. Feminism is not a peaceful movement whose views are so great people want to stand by them immediately; it is a movement of intimidation and fear, and one everybody should be opposing feminism right now. I’m for human rights, not women’s rights because feminism is not for free speech and freedom of ideas and views.


This kind of meme is born of the hegemony of Feminism. When everything has to be for women and by women, any kind of dissenting voice must be squashed.

“We as legislators have passed a very important piece of legislation ensuring that women have safe access to health-care services like reproductive health and abortion services,” he said. “We worked on this bill on a very short time frame to ensure that we protect women.”

The bill’s timing had inflamed political tensions between the governing Liberals and the Opposition Progressive Conservatives. The Tories had proposed passing the bill immediately after it was introduced, with no debate or committee hearings, and the Liberals declined, which led the PCs to accuse the government of trying to draw it out, hoping it would expose divisions within the PC party.

First, I have never seen any news story where there were riots between Pro-Life and Pro-Choice people. The only intimidation I see in this is the Ontario Government attacking people’s right to protest something they oppose. The fact that the Liberals wanted to try to cause division is yet another Marxist tactic. They intimidated the PC party to see if they could create any segregation, creating a political divide between Pro-Choice and Pro-Life politicians.

I almost want to show my disgust of this law by breaking it as soon as it gets implemented. I want to organise a peaceful sit-in, surrounding an abortion clinic for all 150 meters to make our voices heard, that we will not be intimidated by the government as it tries to divide us. I want the Ontario government to arrest me, to show how far they have fallen in this pit, exposing Ontario and Canada to the hegemony of feminism and Marxism.

Opposition Leader Patrick Brown noted his party unanimously voted for the bill’s passage Wednesday, and said it did not cause any divisions within his caucus.

Several of his caucus members — including those who have espoused socially conservative views — however, were absent for the vote. Two were away for health reasons, Brown said, though they are not the members who hold those views.

Yes, because people being absent for a vote because they had morals and wanted to vote no, but you intimidated them by saying your party has to vote ‘Pro-Choice’ look good and can’t bring up LGBT issues either shows there isn’t a fracturing of the PC party right now Patrick. I am voting Conservative in the Ontario election of 2018, not because I like Patrick Brown, but we cannot afford another four years of Kathleen Wynne. It is making me want to get involved in politics myself to be a political dissident in the real world, to expose the dirty corruption of the PC party in Ontario.

I want a provincial party that represents my best interests, not one that continually bows down to these divisive forces that force the socially conservative voices, like myself, to be silent. Marxism and good people doing nothing about it is a black hole that is consuming everything good in the world, and everybody needs to stand against these forces. Ontario conservatives choose Patrick Brown before a time we were organising online and making our voices heard, so he is a remnant of the neoconservative movement. In 10 years, we will have a better leader for Ontario. It’s good to see Andrew Scheer as the federal Conservatives leader because he is fighting the culture war with a few of his decisions.

Brown did not directly address the absence of the social conservative members, but noted many Liberals were away as well. That included two of three Liberals who have been praised by anti-abortion group Campaign Life Coalition for their views.

The lone politician to vote against the bill was Jack MacLaren, a former Progressive Conservative who now sits as an independent after joining the Trillium Party, which the legislature does not recognize as an official party.

I’m glad there are people on both sides of the political divide, both Liberals and Progressive Conservatives who were absent for the vote, who has been praised by the Campaign Life Coalition. It shows how much intimidation that is going on behind the scenes in both the Liberals and the Conservatives parties. Both parties are hell bent to cause a massive division between Pro-Life people and Pro-Choice, and substantially between men and women.

And I am glad to see one person, Jack MacLaren having the balls to be there and be counted as he votes against this considerable attack on the free speech people in Ontario. We have you in our sights, Patrick and Kathleen. We can see how you operate when people who would vote against this measure leave the legislature on the day of the vote. You probably make it so stressful for those members of parliament that they retreat from the opposition of their views, again, showing how much you respect freedom of speech.

Thanks for reading guys, and have an excellent day!

If you like this blog, make sure you share this on your social media feeds by using the buttons below.

Don’t forget to bookmark my home page to ensure you can find out what I am going to be blogging about next.

If you want to connect with me, the best place is Minds.com, because I am there multiple times a day to check what’s going on. You can also contact me on Twitter.

Trolly News Update – Oct. 25th, 2017 – The Uranium One deal

Hey, guys, there’s excellent news. According to reports, The Trump dossier was bought and paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC. Not to mention, there has never been one person, in an almost one-year witch hunt, that has provided a single shred of evidence against Trump to prove he and Russian officials colluded to ‘undermine’ our democracy. Recently, I watched a live broadcast of Hillary Clinton talking to a crowd of people in Montreal, and she went on and on about how ‘Russia’ was ‘attacking’ democracy everywhere, and good people needed to ‘fight it’. That means, everybody needs to fight for the establishment in order to fight for democracy, LOL! Yeah, an establishment that says there is no choice but pro-choice, who force ‘transgendered’ education on our children, who deny a tax credit to help people with Type1 Diabetes as a massive tax grab, and so many other things. And most importantly, last night while I scoured the Internet on the Uranium One scandal, Trudeau and Frank Giustra, someone the Uranium One scandal centres on, happen to ‘admire’ each other quite a bit.

From House Republicans to investigate Russia uranium deal tied to Canadian company

Republican leaders of two committees in the U.S. House of Representatives launched an investigation on Tuesday into the purchase by a Russian firm several years ago of a Canadian-based company that owned some 20 per cent of U.S. uranium supplies.

Republican lawmakers say they want to know whether the 2010 transaction involving Rosatom and Uranium One, which has headquarters in Toronto, was fully investigated by the FBI and other agencies before it was approved by a panel that oversees foreign investment in U.S. strategic assets.

If you haven’t seen the meme, this is what they are talking about.


Everybody wants to figure out if this scandal is for real because millions of dollars went to the Clinton Foundation from the Russians. We want to know if it was in the kindness of their hearts, or was it because they wanted to buy lots of uranium, like Canadians want to know if the green light of High-Tech Military firms to Chinese companies is because of donations to the Trudeau Foundation. My gut says, in both cases, we have some very greedy politicians who have been caught in pay to play politics.

What is interesting is that Frank Giustra, the central figure of this controversy, is a close personal friend of The Clinton’s, following them on Twitter, and has said some very complimentary things about PM JT on social media, and vice versa.

Frank Giustra (@Frank_Giustra)

2016-01-16, 1:21 PM

With the Rise of Justin Trudeau, Canada Is Suddenly … Hip? – The New York Times- proud Canadian!! nytimes.com/interactive/20…


Frank’s friend list, if you want to verify

Funny thing, Frank doesn’t follow PM JT. I guess Trudeau is just a small potato like the Chinese said. You will never be as famous as Clinton Trudeau, so stop taking lessons from her.

“We’re not going to jump to any conclusions at this time,” said Devin Nunes, a Republican from California. “But one of the things that you know that we’re concerned about is whether or not there was an FBI investigation. Was there a [Department of Justice] investigation? And if so, why was Congress not informed of this matter?”

Some Republicans have claimed that Hillary Clinton’s State Department approved the deal after her husband’s charitable foundation received a $145-million US donation, but the State Department controls only one seat on the panel that approved the transaction and the New York Times reported two years ago that she did not participate in the decision.

Welcome to the wonderful world of politics, where politicians use their power and influence to become ‘filthy rich’. Before its sale, the Harper government’s department of defence put ITF technologies off the table in 2015. After the Trudeau Foundation got a huge donation from Chinese Billionaires, a second review was ordered by Trudeau, to allow O-Net communications to buy it. Of course, that review said it was a-okay. If anybody wants to say that Hillary Clinton didn’t put pressure on the committee that participated in the decision, to give herself an alibi is lying to themselves. We all know she did. She’s a greedy, corrupt politician, and she wanted to make a fortune, and she made it.

Remember, in my comparison started with, the Department of Defence in Canada put a red light on the sale. Why wasn’t the FBI and the Department of Justice involved in this deal? When you are talking about 20% your nation’s stock of materials that make the most devastating weapons our world has ever seen, all those departments are critical stakeholders for that decision. Why was there no investigation into this at all, and why wasn’t anybody informed of this. I hate establishment politicians who think they are entitled to the world because they have a ‘little power’. I’m glad these kinds of controversies came back to bite you in the ass, preventing you from winning the US presidential election.

The accusations gained steam in right-wing media circles after the 2015 publication of the book Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich.

Frank Giustra, the Vancouver-based mining executive who donated $31 million to Clinton Foundation initiatives around the world and pledged millions more, said in a statement at the time “there is not one shred of evidence” that any of the events were connected. Giustra pointed to the fact he sold his stake in Uranium One three years before the Russia deal, and about 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state.

More recently, Giustra tweeted a link to a Harvard study regarding last year’s election coverage, saying that Trump adviser Steve Bannon, Breitbart.com, Clinton Cash author Peter Scheitzer and Fox News helped propagate a story that sowed doubts about Clinton in election voters’ minds.

First, everybody with a brain knows that next to Hollywood, post-secondary institutions are some of the biggest strongholds of cultural Marxism, because Marxist professors indoctrinate students coming into them with ‘social justice’ doctrines. If Harvard made a study saying Trump, Bannon and other forces sowed ‘unfounded’ doubts in voter’s minds about Clinton’s integrity than I will not immediately believe this. You’re saying our concerns are unreasonable, but I say they are completely reasonable, so we are going to have to agree to disagree.

Second, you may not be ‘directly’ involved in this controversy, but I doubt that your friendship with Bill and Hillary Clinton wasn’t involved in this deal somehow. And you ‘helped’ Haiti in 2010 by giving $20mil to help small businesses. How is Haiti? From what I hear, Haitians still don’t want to go back and are coming to Canada from the US in droves. Did your whole $20mil helped. And couldn’t you have learned from your close personal friends in Uranium One about Russian business interests wanting to buy the company and then tell your friends Bill and Hillary, as you worked closely with them?

You may not have had a financial stake, but how many friends from Uranium One were putting that idea in your ear at the time? I don’t trust how this looks. It looks like you were very much involved in this. Heck, according to your bio, you are involved in Hollywood, fucking Hollywood. Anybody involved in that pit of vipers is a friend of nobody.

You’re the perfect storm in my eyes Frank, and I have no doubt that you were involved in this somehow.

So I want to know, did you have anything to do with that sale of the Uranium One to Russia, and I want to know if the Clinton Foundation profiteered from the sale of that company. Hillary, you have some explaining to do.

Thanks for reading guys, and have a great day.

If you want to see everything that I work on, you should sub to me on Minds. Everything and I mean everything, goes on that social media account. You can also contact me on Twitter.

And don’t forget to bookmark my home page and share buttons at the bottom of this blog.

​Trolly News Update – Oct. 24th, 2017 – School Board Trustee attacked for standings against the LGBT push on Schools.

First, I am not a sexologist. I do not study the differences between men and women, other than the most basic stuff. Men are most happy working when they are experiencing success with something they are passionate about, and women are most happy when they have a connection with people, on average. That is about the extent of my understanding of the biological differences between men and women, and James Damore is right. I only know the basics, and I just do what makes sense. The push of Gender in our culture has prompted me to say I do not have a gender, I only have a biological sex. Anything else is just people’s imagination, and that may work for them, but how does somebody objectively prove someone is a tall pansexual flirty wood sprite. I know there are people like Blaire White and Theryn Meyer who legitimately have gender dysphoria and need to go through all the treatments for it, and I know that hormone blockers can have unexpected impacts on development, and there’s plenty of people who regret their transition.

To me, I would advise caution. If you are not old enough to legally drive, you’re not old enough to make such a life-changing decision. If any of my children were Transgendered, I would have them wait until they are 16 to make those decisions. Children parrot things they see on TV and in the classroom because that is how we learn. If you introduced a child to these concepts when they are six years old, they don’t have the brain development to think about the information critically. And while I would say children should trust their ‘instincts’ on some things, I definitely would not want my child to think about wanting to change, because this is a lifelong decision or a life filled with regret. But in this day and age, I’m just a ‘transphobe’ for having anything but an ‘if your child wants to transition, get them on those hormone blockers now’ mentality.

From Chiliwack school trustee: Allowing children to ‘change gender is nothing short of child abuse’

Facebook post declares B.C. Ministry of Education is enforcing a ‘biologically absurd theory’

First, the media presents transgenderism in ways that are very absurd and do not reflect reality. If you listen to the press, you’d think that there would be a much higher percentage of people who are suffering from gender dysphoria. But the number of people suffering from the disorder is only three people in every 1000 people. Sure, in a worldwide population of seven billion you’re going to get twenty-one million, and that’s a lot of people, but it still is a relatively small amount of our population. But with the recent push on Transgenderism in the schooling system, we are seeing a much higher amount of people concerned and an ‘elevation’ of some reported cases. And a lot of it is because people claim ‘gender’ and ‘biological sex’ are not the same, which leads to all kinds of lunacy, like people being gender queer demi-boys. How do you objectively prove something like a ‘gender queer demi-boy’ exists other than a person’s imagination?

And before someone says, what about their ‘gender expression’, i.e. the clothes they wear and their mannerisms? Again, I would say that is all personality. Men dressing in drag for Halloween this year are not ‘trans’. Objectively, they are male.

In a Facebook post Monday, Chilliwack school trustee Barry Neufeld denounced members of B.C.’s education system as “radical cultural nihilists” for their policies on gender rights and education.

“At the risk of being labelled a bigoted homophobe, I have to say that I support traditional family values and I agree with the College of Pediatricians that letting little children choose to change gender is nothing short of child abuse,” wrote Neufeld.

I completely agree with everything that Barry is saying in that post. Science is science. Objectively there are two primary biological sexes, male and female. Objectively, there are some intersex individuals – but they represent one in every 1000 or more. Objectively, some people have Gender Dysphoria, but that is only three in every 1000 people. Yes there is diversity, but not as much as Bill Nye says.

When it comes down to it, the nuclear family is the best base social unit to build a society. When men and women live with each other, helping each other while taking care of children the best outcomes happen for our children. Children raised in nuclear families have higher educational levels, better income, less likely to involved in crime and have many other advantages, compared to both homosexual couples and single parent families. If people wanted their children to have real privilege, choose to be in a monogamous relationship with a loving partner. If you ‘re going to be privileged in our society, no matter what your gender or skin colour is, do your best to have a loving family that you stick with and sticks with you.

Social justice Marxism is attacking these ideas, and have been attacking them from day one, not realising how important these are for human development. They want to attack the heterosexual nuclear family so much; they will do anything to dismantle it. But for smart people, we can choose not to listen to the people who want to attack this most basic family unit. While I’m not against homosexuals getting married and having families, that doesn’t mean I don’t celebrate the nuclear family, being a husband and a father is what men are supposed to be at the end of the day. I want to share my passions of writing, art, and conservative values with the children I have with my fiance, it’s one of my most influential desires.

And when it comes down to it, logically speaking, if people are being discouraged from being in monogamous and happy relationships, how will we start the next generation? No matter what, we should always strive to make having families the most natural thing in the world to have. Cars, computers, and fame are not as important as having and creating a family, so it shouldn’t matter if we have the ‘best of everything’ when we compare it to having the best family we can have. I grew up in a single parent household, and let me tell you; it was hell. When it comes down to it, an average child in a single parent household has problems, but ‘gifted’ children have it much worse time because we can slip through the cracks far easier.

Education Minister Rob Fleming said trustees can have their own opinions, but the province’s public education system is one that values human rights, democracy and inclusion.

“We have very good consensus around the entire school system around the need to eliminate discrimination to counter bullying,” said Fleming.

First, I disagree with you. I do not believe bullying is a bad thing. For instance, If some creep was going around girls and doing things that made girls uneasy, and a bunch of guys decided to put a stop to it, the creep will learn a lesson, and the girls will be left alone and be more relaxed. Second, it teaches self-mastery. The harder the life you live, the stronger people become. If you are creating a ‘safe space’ for people, they will grow weaker, which is the opposite of what we want. We live in a time where it is both the most comfortable time in the history of Mankind, with all our technologies bringing us whatever we want in minutes, and the hardest because everything is crumbling around us. People who shelter themselves from people who disagree with them grow weaker from this state, which makes other hardships even harder to go through.

This is why we see protest signs like this.

They think they will get a much better shake under communism, and that all their needs are going to be taken care of by the state, and they want it to be easy. The ‘safe spaces’ mentality creates weak people. Children who preserve from adversity will grow up to be stronger individuals who can go through the hard times. I never had a ‘safe space’, but that has only motivated me to the best blogger and writer I can be because I love sharing my thoughts with people. The more social media giants bully us to deny us our voices, the harder I work because I am not afraid of that giant.

“We are in the fifth year of our erase bullying strategy, where we very much looked at some of the harassment and fear that gay and lesbian students, and transgender students, in particular, have experienced in our school system, and there was a consensus to eliminate that.”

All B.C. schools have anti-bullying policies that include explicit references to sexual orientation and gender identity.

First, you cannot, and should not eliminate bullying. The idea that the state needs to get involved to this is ridiculous. There is nothing more empowering in life, beyond being in a family that loves you that sticks together, than standing up to bullies. It gives a rush of dopamine, and it will help your in life if you consistently do that. Everybody will know you are a badass as well, and you can go forward.

You are trying to take that away from children who need that experience. When the state eliminates a child’s ability to stand up to bullying, you are removing a vast resource that helps them develop that inner strength they need to overcome future hardships. In a loving household, bullied children can find peace and solace with their family who stands by them, giving them the chance to be strong. It will provide them with hope to continue forward.

In my opinion, all of this shit is getting out of hand. This push for ‘trans’ inclusion is only causing children who get confused, who make rash decisions before they are ready. We need to be open but hesitant about the integration of transgendered education, as it only affects 3 out of 1000 people, and some people that are suffering from gender dysphoria transition and some do not. There is no 1 size fits all solution for that mental illness.

Thanks for reading guys, and have a great day!

If you want to see what I have to say next, feel free to bookmarks my home page. And don’t forget to use the share buttons at the bottom of this blog to share my blog with your friends on the Internet.

Minds is a fantastic place to get a hold of me and to support me. Its point system for upvotes and comments is an excellent tool to allow me to share my work with everybody on the website. If you want to discuss anything, I regularly visit the site every single hour to get my 50 points. You can also contact me on Twitter.