Currently, I am going through training to become more employable before I start my new job starting next month, which is why I am not blogging every single day right now. It is a marvellous course, and much of it deals not with the technical skills, but the employability skills, like self-control. Yes, I have to take that myself, sometimes I get in my way, thinking I am better than the job that I am working at for finances because my writing skills are excellent. That is according to free service Grammarly, and all the people who have affirmed how good of a blogger I am. This week shows starts with self-control, and the repercussions of losing it.
When Juli Briskman gave her bosses at the government contracting firm a heads-up that she was the unidentified cyclist, they took her into a room and fired her
First, no matter how much you ‘hate trump’, you shouldn’t give him the finger. That’s stupid. The best course of action, if you are going display your distaste for President Trump, put your disagreements online, and not in the real world, where people can start rumours that get you fired. Being a professional should be the first and most important thing on your mind, not that you hate President Trump.
Second, telling your bosses that you were the one who did that. Well, you earned your ‘badge of honour’. Did you think, hey my place of employment is ‘a resist’ company, so I will proudly tell them I gave Donald Trump the finger? To think this wouldn’t completely backfire on you shows how backwards your mindset has become. What you did was completely unprofessional, and I am sure you’re screaming, I don’t deserve to lose my job because I protested the President. Well, that is how the world of work functions, and you just lost your job for being an idiot. There is a time and a place for everything, and that was not the time or place to do something like that.
In our culture, being offensive is easy. Juli found out how many conservatives found out that was offensive, though, in my opinion, she’s just a moron. I’d just laugh at her for being a moron. But these lines of ‘good taste’ can end up cost much more than a job. Take our good friend Mark “Count Dankula” Meechan, and his Nazi Pug video.
Mark Meechan, 30, from Coatbridge, is on trial at Airdrie Sheriff Court where he committing a hate crime. His solicitor was refused permission to play clips of comedians Joan Rivers, John Cleese and Larry David, as well as Labour MP Harriet Harman making Holocaust jokes in court
I wish Mark luck because it was a joke. Yes, it was a dark joke, but where Juli had ill intentions in giving Donald Trump the finger, Dank doesn’t intend on doing anything negative at all to Jews. He’s not insulting Jews. CD is not praising Hitler. He’s only making fun of Nazi’s and making a joke with his girlfriend’s pug. I’m my understanding; crimes are things people intend on doing. You can’t accidentally take a pack of gum, rob someone, rape someone, or anything else for that matter. Those people planned to do those actions. So if someone twists around and elbows someone behind them, that’s not intentional, and therefore not a crime. A joke is a joke, and the video doesn’t motivate people to go out and gas the Jews and be Hitler. If a person intends to make people laugh, and not to hurt the Jews, than how can some break the law. How can there be a Hate Crime when there is not hate?
An attempt by Meechan’s solicitor advocate Ross Brown to play clips of comedians Joan Rivers, John Cleese and Larry David, as well as Labour MP Harriet Harman making Holocaust jokes in court was refused and branded ‘irrelevant’ by the sheriff.
Irrelevant. If you didn’t think there were real double standards for the elites in entertainment and politics and us poor regular folks, here it is. Joan Rivers, John Cleese, Larry David and Harriet Harm can make Holocaust jokes, but we must crucify Mark because he wanted to make a funny video and put it up on YouTube.
I hate Hollywood for so many reasons, and this is one of them. Being rich and famous gives you a pass on everything, whether is it committing murder and getting away with it, or committing sexual assault against so many women, or young men. Hollywood’s professional standards are horrible, but they get away with it because they have wealth and some guy on YouTube experiences societies’ full punishment for a simple joke.
Talking about ‘There’s Nazi’s everywhere’, some ‘progressive’ blogger is alleging that Taylor Swift is not doing enough to stop them. After all people think she voted Trump because she’s remaining silent on who she voted for. I love the minds of progressives.
Taylor Swift, the chart-topping singer known for high-profile spats with Kanye West, Kim Kardashian and Katy Perry, has entered into a new feud – this time with a little-known blogger who suggested that Swift isn’t doing enough to denounce neo-Nazi and white supremacist fans.
Swift’s legal team issued a legal notice to PopFront, a California-based blog with fewer than 300 Twitter followers, demanding a retraction of its article, “Swiftly to the alt-right: Taylor subtly gets the lower case kkk in formation,” which accuses the singer without any evidence of supporting the white supremacist movement.
The far left seems to hate the right so much now, silence is considered capitulation, and Taylor Swift has not done enough ‘I denounce the Alt-Right, Neo-Nazis, and fascists’ to earn their trust. So, let’s take a look at this article.
On the other hand, the idea that Taylor Swift is an icon of white supremacist, nationalists, and other fringe groups, seems to finally be getting mainstream attention. But the dog whistles to white supremacy in the lyrics of her latest single are not the first time that some have connected the (subtle) dots. A white supremacist blogger from neo-Nazi site The Daily Stormer was quoted in a Broadly article in May 2016 as saying, “it is also an established fact that Taylor Swift is secretly a Nazi and is simply waiting for the time when Donald Trump makes it safe for her to come out and announce her Aryan agenda to the world.” What “facts” the blogger is pointing to are unclear (and likely invented); still, his statement exemplifies how neo-Nazis and white supremacists look to her as their pop icon.
First, don’t quote the Daily Stormer. Don’t believe the Daily Stormer. Don’t even visit the Daily Stormer. They deliberately put up Shitposts to mess with people like you. I suppose you’re not a fan of Papa John’s anymore either, with their Zeig heil pizzas that they deliver to every member of the Alt-Right.
You just fell for their shit. Oh, we love Taylor Swift, and in your eyes, she must be a Nazi. I guess this gay fan makes Taylor Swift gay now. LOL!
Also, how can you establish the fact that someone is ‘secretly a Nazi’? LOL! If they are secretly a Nazi, you will not be able to establish that as a fact. LOL! Secrets and facts are mutually exclusive, you moron.
Look, just because the Daily Stormer says they love Taylor Swift doesn’t mean Taylor Swift is a Neo-Nazi. If you are going this far to fight ‘white supremacy’, you are no better than Joseph McCarthy, trying to out every hidden ‘communist’. You seem to be suffering from paranoia, because that article is just irrational, and leaps in logic, and rumours.
I’m going to use your ‘logic’ to determine ‘exactly’ what you are. POPFRONT is the name of the website. Well, a ‘Front’ is something providing ‘cover’ for activities you don’t want people to see. Well, with everything coloured red, including the Facebook icon, which is 99.9 percent always blue, except your website, I am going to say that POPFRONT is a cover to express communistic ideas.
How does it feel? You see Nazi’s everywhere because you are a commie, and every kind ‘commie’ must defeat the Nazi’s. Are you a member of ‘By Any Means Necessary’? Come one, answer me, you Stalin-Loving commie.
Of course, the ACLU is defending the right of POPFRONT to post up pointless allegations based upon rumours and half-baked connections. Apparently, Defamation of Character is protected by the 1st amendment, which it is not.
But the ACLU needs to raise it’s image with ‘progressives’, by involving itself in something where someone did break the law. But I need to remind myself, most of the right’s freedom of speech is violence, and violence and breaking the law is the left’s right to free speech.
Antifa is a special stupid. Only they think they could bring weapons to ‘bash the fash’ because their violence is free speech and the ‘Nazis’ free speech is violence. The ACLU is deciding to help this website, for ‘freedom of speech’ is saying that defamation of character is freedom of speech now.
Yes, all you need to peruse a defamation of character lawsuit is a person to put up any unsubstantiated claim, like Taylor Swift if a white supremacist, and for average people to believe it. The comments on their blog prove her case.
Well, that’s my shitpost for this Saturday. Thanks for reading and have a great day.
And don’t forget to bookmark my front page to check for future blogs.