Trolly Takedown – Anita makes a fool of herself over StarWars

A couple of years ago, Anita pissed me off. She commented on StarWars. Although my opinion of some of the actors (cough – Mark Hamill – cough) have changed, the original trilogy was some of my favourite movies as a kid. I grew up when George Lucas produced the first three films and seeing a sword-wielding knight fighting the forces of evil with the magic of the ‘force’ has always had an impact on me. In fact, one of my ideas, which I am calling Tales from the Three Cities, has a superhero who was initially inspired by the Jedi, though he went through many, many edits over the original conception. When Anita first reviewed The Force Awakens, I was pissed. She said, why is there always a revolving history between the fight for good and evil. Anita doesn’t understand storytelling at all. She doesn’t understand the power of myth and legends, where good opposes evil. I thought, if she doesn’t understand there is a dark side, she might be a part of that ‘dark side’ of tyranny that forces people to be something or else, like feminists insist we must be feminist or else we don’t care about women or women’s issues.

Last week she put out yet another ‘StarWars’ video, and this time it was how sexist StarWars is. Yeah, StarWars is sexist, and you need to point it all out.

Here’s the full video.

First, I know the attempts at humour. It’s so cringy that I couldn’t help but laugh at Anita. She seems one of those hapless baboons that hopes you find what they do funny. I kind of weep that her video passes for creativity in 2017 (Hey SJWs, your current year argument is just as useful to us). It’s just a non-government funded propaganda piece that wants to instil how sexist and racist StarWars is. I wonder if that is why, despite the video being up on YouTube for five days, it only has 13k views to it, and I know at least 3 are mine, to watch it first, then to formulate my arguments against it second, and meme mining as the third part of the process.

Yeah, so nothing major here. While Anita acknowledged that Leia Organa (Princess Leia) plays a huge part of the original trilogy, she is still bitter about the ‘Bikini’ thing. She is so hung up with the ‘male gaze’, despite the fact gay men check each other out just as much as heterosexual men check out women, and lesbians check out women.

In one paragraph and one example, we can thoroughly debunk the ‘Male Gaze’. First, we see that women can ‘sexually objectify’ both men and women as much as any man does, Hillary Clinton is a prime example of this, but men are primed to be sexually enticed by visuals, while others the right whisper can drive them wild. In fact, what really drives my gears is hearing those dirty little things that gets me going more than the visuals now. We’re oversaturated the market with visuals of sexy women now, with everything from Victoria’s Secret to Pornhub that I find the right thing said in the right voice is 10x sexier than any visual now. But hey, I’m a writer and that might just be my fancy.

Her next argument is the whole – only three other women talked in the original trilogy for a total of 1 minute and 2 seconds, other than Leia Organa. Well, first you are assuming R2D2’s gender. Sorry. . . I had to do that.

Second, of the 1 minute and 2 seconds of entirely secondary characters, and you do understand what a secondary role is right, you only played a total of 18 seconds of that dialogue in a 5-minute video. You took away from those women’s agency by shortening their clips. (Okay, okay, I’ll give Anita the benefit of the doubt, fair use requires her to keep those clips short.)

And then you go on and on about how the vast majority of people in the StarWars films are men and not women. If the movies were called Star Journey, where 5-6 friends were travelling the stars in a galaxy far, far away, I would go – yeah, it should be around 50-50 in representation, because that’s called an adventure. My adventure webcomic that I am creating will have your perfect gender balance Anita, two male heroes and two female heroes, and each will be critical in certain parts of the story, and the two women will have many conversations that are not about men so that it will pass the Bechtel test.

But complaining about the gender ratio about a war film is wrong. In most war rooms, the majority of people making the decisions and relaying those orders are going to be men, because men are the primary protectors of our culture. Men will use their bodies to fight for a culture’s way of life to protect the future generation, and it’s a biological trait that men should engage in because it helps us grow as people, instead of being selfish and self-absorbed, which I would assume you would consider ‘toxic masculinity’. I consider war the perfect way for a man to express his best self because he is protecting his fellow soldiers, his country and those he cares about, that self-sacrifice is the greatest love a man can show, that he is willing to give his life for his friends.

So going on about your stupid argument, for every 39 men in StarWars, there is only one woman of note is just ridiculous. Thirty-nine men are practising the most enlightened way a man can be, to protect his friends and those he cares about and for freedom, and you complain that this is sexist. With the number of deaths in all the films, it is pretty much the epitome of reality, despite the force and being in a different galaxy, because 97.7 percent of all combat deaths are men.

As you said, it was never about gaming, it was always about social justice, vindicating every one of your critics, your new war against Hollywood is just as ridiculous. That is why only 13k have watched your video. You’re a forgotten fool of an era that no longer needs a con artist. Your lack of credibility is why your funding drives are 30k, instead of 200k now. Nobody cares, and you’re just an idiot that people keep track of to see what the fuck you have to say now.

Well, all I have to say, Anita, may Kek be with you on your journey, because the force is weak with your video.

Thanks for reading and have a great day guys.

If you like my blog, make sure you keep track of all my projects through my social media accounts Minds.com and Twitter.

And the more people who share these blogs on Twitter and other social media accounts the better my readership is, so please use those share buttons at the bottom of this blog. Afterall, Anita’s discredited piece of shit got 24 retweets and 76 likes on Twitter, share my stuff guys!

Make sure you bookmark my front page to keep on top of the stories I write or follow me through your email, link to the side, and WordPress will send you an email when I publish my next blog.

Advertisements

​Trolly’s Hot Topic – 09/12/2017 – The #MeToo movement

We all know how #MeToo started. Harvey Weinstein was accused of sexual misconduct by several women in a New York Times article. The Harvey Weinstein allegations have caused a domino effect, where men and women have gone public with their claims against Hollywood ‘Elites’ like Kevin Spacey, Charlie “I’m Winning” Sheen, Dustin Huffman and so many others in Hollywood and Washington DC, good bye Al Franken. I just want to be on the record, fuck Hollywood – they kill creativity using remakes and established franchises all the time. I can’t think of a new movie idea in Hollywood since the Matrix or the Riddick movies. This will be an entire chapter of the book I am creating for next year. From our TV sets, so many people have to wonder, is there a decent guy out there who doesn’t use his power and influence and ‘The Patriarchy’ to overpower every woman.

Sure, there are memes everywhere that would suggest men are only capable of one thing, and that is thinking of ‘sex, sex, sex’ every five seconds, thousands of times a day. That stereotype makes me laugh, because I know that is impossible. If thousands of engineers who sent dozens of people to the moon were only thinking of sex every five seconds, I don’t think we could have gotten people to the moon. It’s a nice and tidy feminism sexism that perpetuates everything we hear from today’s media.

While I was taking my six-week skills course, there was 11 men and three women. Listening to Anita Sarkeesian, the 11 men must have been continuously harassing those three women to no end. After all, factory work is man’s work, no women allowed, LOL. But us 11 men must have had the willpower to the level of Superman, because we didn’t offend any of the women without due cause, and it was never in a sexual way. Yes men are visual, and there were some attractive women I was in class with and in the factory, but that’s just our Hippocampus. To expect men only use that part of our brains, and not use our frontal lobes for willpower and good judgement is plain out sexism. I’m tired of this stupid stereotype I see in the media. 11 men behaved appropriately with three women in the class, and the job is around 60-40 men and women ratio, and I only heard of one moron who had stepped over the line in six weeks I took that class. The plant management issued a one-week suspension to him, and the supervisors on the shift were going to monitor him to ensure he didn’t break the rules like he was an amoeba under the microscope.

The above situation is one of the primary problems I have with the #MeToo movement, and the simmering of the Internet culture for the past year or so. Everybody is always talking about how men indiscriminately sexually harass women on a continual basis all the time, and it is #AllMen, and Sarkeesian’s necklace says never to trust men because we’re ‘predators’. In reality, in a workplace of over 200 people, there was one idiot. If a Rape culture is a culture that excuses this kind of behaviour, why is that one idiot under the microscope for going over the line and so many people are condemning what is happening in Hollywood right now.

These examples should show how much our culture has moved forward regarding women’s rights and dignity. I can’t think of one man who hasn’t condemned what is happening in Hollywood right now. You give so few people that much money and influence and expect the purest and righteous behaviour is an oxymoron. This entire narrative has both upset me, thinking about how many young men and women who were abused at the hands of people we as an entire culture has given that much power to, and at the same time, it makes me laugh.

Why laughter? The answer to that question is simple, name a person you know who doesn’t praise movies from very early ages. Our parents and family members always talk about their favourite movies, and everybody had their favourite movies when they were kids. Mine was Star Wars and Buck Rogers (I’m dating myself, yes I was born in the 70s). I wanted to be like Luke Skywalker so much as I was growing up, using the force and a light sabre to defeat all the evil in the world. Every single kid has thought about being a hero in a movie. None of us can deny we want to be rich and famous, and I agree with Chad from Nickleback, being famous is a disease. I hope I can keep my kids grounded here in reality and to entirely reject and even pity people in Hollywood as I do. They are going to see Daddy rant about Hollywood a lot during their lifetimes, and hopefully, that iron sharpens their iron. I want them to hate and want to dismantle Hollywood who is killing all creativity now. Only once and a while does it have something good. But for every Matrix and Me, Myself, and I there is 1000 shows and movies like Gifted, Captain America and the New Jumanji movie (Yes, it is a remake of a Robin Williams movie).

That lack of creativity is the huge problem. I believe in Capitalism because everybody is worth being paid for their talent, their passion, and their skill, but we have put Hollywood on a pedestal it doesn’t deserve to be on, especially now. I’m not saying people like Harvey Weinstein are not problems, but how much we idolise Hollywood makes us partially culpable for that. We push people to want to be in Hollywood, to put themselves in those situations, because we put those movies on pedestals. Fuck, even Sarkeesian, grand feminist extraordinaire, keeps Hollywood alive in her latest video. She just accepts that Hollywood is a fact of life and hasn’t realized it needs to be stomped out of existence. So many people celebrating StarWars right now, and I’m not even going to see it in theatres. I’ll watch it on NetFlix when it comes out, using that ‘good old’ Frontal Lobe to have willpower and sound judgement.

But this hasn’t stopped women from all around the world, filled with anger against the perceived treatment they have had at the hands of ‘The Patriarchy’. In fact, these #MeToo Silence breakers are being named as people of the year by Time Magazine. Good, we should have these conversations, but rationally. Anita’s tainted sexist narrative not to trust any man and to attack the idea of #Notall men shouldn’t infect this discussion. In fact, we should completely ignore her bullshit. She’s a perpetually offended individual who wouldn’t survive a six-week skill building course to help her get and maintain a real job, unlike my ten friends and myself, who graduated the course with full-time jobs starting tomorrow. If she couldn’t do that, we shouldn’t even listen to her opinion. She’s never worked a real day in her life.

I’ve often said that these social justice forces, like Anita Sarkeesian, are not interested in forgiveness or thankfulness. They will live perpetually in black holes, sucking out every shred of light and goodness out of them and the people around them. As mini-dictators who are enforcing their wills or you’re out of the club, they will never be satisfied.

If you don’t believe me, Roaming Millennial does a fantastic job of how these ferocious ideologues are, you can’t interview, show a clip or even remain silent without being condemned by them. Social Justice will never forgive or forget your sins in these matters. Sarkeesian will continue to spout her stupid shit until the end of time, and most people will continue to ignore her. She had her hay day during the beginning of #GamerGate, but it has ended. Nobody cares anymore because she has taken it too far.

I can only hope that cooler heads can prevail and that we can find some balance between human beings evolving to be partners and being in relationships and for personal independence and the ability to create a life for ourselves. Right now, feminists like Sarkeesian don’t want that at all.

What we need to talk about is learning manners and etiquette.

From The consequence of this new sexual counter-revolution? No sex at all

None of this justifies men in positions of power behaving like pigs towards people who work with them. If there is good to come from this, then it would be in such behaviour being deemed more unacceptable than it has been. But sexual etiquette is not a science. It is improvisation in a very imperfectly set-up battlefield. Only at the most end does the law have anything to say. Everywhere else we are talking about the exercise of manners. True, we may currently be rethinking those manners. But let us not do so in the midst of a moral panic, high on counter-revolutionary retribution. Or if we must, then let us still worry a little about where this stampede may yet take us.

Like the idiot who was on a one-week suspension, we can learn not to make the same stupid mistakes and avoid most of this. Sure, some people may think saying a woman looks nice is paramount to harassment, but most men and most women can pick out the morons in their midst and these things are quickly resolved in our culture now. There is no need for feminists to go around and say that men can’t be trusted because they are just as bad in creating a negative culture as the guys who go over the line.

I am glad this conversation is happening because this can be a tremendous opportunity to heal some of the stresses in gender relations in today’s culture. Furthermore, Hollywood and other highly ‘lucrative’ industries need to be knocked off their pedestals, because they create the environment where people will want to go through that just to ‘make it big’, while giving predators something to leverage over people’s heads. We helped create the monster that is Hollywood with the billions we spend on Movies, Blu-Rays, DVDs and the television we watch, which is why I will not go to the movies or buy BluRays or DVDs from the box stores like Walmart anymore. We enabled Harvey Weinstein to do this and to suck the money out of alternative platforms to prevent independents from doing what they love for a living.

Thanks for reading guys, and have a great day.

Make sure you bookmark my front page and share this blog on social media, buttons at the bottom of this blog.

You can follow me on, Minds.com and Twitter.

There and back again, a Trolly Journey!

I wonder where I should start this blog. So much has changed in the past few months, and I do believe that things have changed for this humble Internet Troll. Sometimes you go on a quest that is your choice, and others you are poor old Bilbo who was kicked out his own home by a cranky old wizard, forced out of your warm home where everything is familiar. That’s how my journey started. I started October as a comfortable blogger where I could express my opinion on the news of the day, working hard every single day on my blogs and my art, developing the skills I want to build. My life was perfect. And then my life was turned upside down by no fault of my own, and I was involved in skills training course that was going to get me a job at the end of it.

That started on Oct. 30th, 2017. I have to say, because that was not my choice, I was cynical about the course at first. Especially the first day. It felt like I was in a class where the teacher was holding the hands of a bunch of kindergarten students, where were talked about ourselves. It felt like pulling my teeth, talking about my life with a bunch of strangers that I was meeting for the first time. I don’t have an anxiety disorder, but I am a private person by nature (go figure, I’m an INTJ). I had major doubts. I have 3 diplomas from College – Journalism, Web Journalism and Animation – and some of the people I was in class with hadn’t even graduated high school.

I felt like a fish out of water. I liked living in my highly intellectual world where I blog every single day about what I think of our culture through the news of the day, and doing some drawings. I was kinda overwhelmed, because I figured that I knew pretty much how to live, and I was in a skills course that was suppose to give people a ‘second chance’. I wasn’t like any other person in the course. Of course, on day one, the worst kind of person revealed herself. She was one of the most entitled people I had ever seen in my life. You know what I blogged about, so you could imagine exactly how I felt about that person – she was all about how the workplace needed to conform to her wishes, and if she was late she always had a ‘good’ reason for it. Being the introvert that I am, it took a while for me to say, you’re not entitled to a job, and if your attitude is that, you’re not going to have a job (spoiler alert, she didn’t complete the course). So, yes, there are SJWs in the real world.

I was introduced to many new concepts during that first three weeks in class. The course brought up all kinds of new ideas which have helped the manufacturing industry over the past 100 years, preparing all of us for a job at a meat packing plant. If you worked hard in the course, and you worked hard at the placement at the factory, then you would get a job offer. One of the first was 5S and lean manufacturing. This introduced me to the idea of Kai Zen, which means slow gradual change. I don’t have to have a perfect life right now, but I am getting better, and that is what is essential.

During the first week of my placement, I was continually wondering, am I even going to be able to handle the fast placed of the factory. Where does an intellectual like myself fit into a plant whose purpose is to send thousands of packages of beef and pork every single day? I was overwhelmed by the sheer pace of the place. Fortunately, I had started to exercise every single day because that makes you more intelligent. That helped me while I had to tray 300-400 10lbs roasts a day for three days.

It was on the Sunday after the first week of placement when I realised something. I was frustrated that I didn’t get to blog every single day, and I wasn’t sure how I fit into that plant. I wanted to quit the course, but that would have some severe financial consequences. I felt like the mouse in a punishment maze, and I hated it. I wanted a manifest reward for my work, and it was up to me to find that prize, because I didn’t see it during the first week of placement. And I knew I needed to find something in this experience that helped me focus on a reward. And then I realised something; I could use all that finances this new job will bring to fund what I want to do. My life may not be the perfect ideal right now, but if I worked hard and continued to do what I wanted, I could make my life better, slowly but surely.

So, what the hell do I want to do? First, I want to write a book for next year. Then I realised that I could save the money and use it for my writing and art projects – and a solid goal appeared in my mind. I wasn’t there for the instructor, my family, my fiance; I was there for myself!

I can pay for a self-publishing company to create the ebook on iBooks and the Kindle store. Expect that this Nov. of next year.

And at the new job, I could see how I can make that plant a new project in itself, learning every single part of the factory and figure out what can be improved. The review after the placement was over was fantastic, they were very interested in me learning about the plant, knowing that was my real strength. The teacher must have put that idea into their ears, which has me excited about that job, which I officially start Sunday.

More importantly, I learned that I did fit in with my classmates, and I have several new friends, and I am shocked by how useful this course has been for me. Those relationships all borne out of a situation that I wasn’t entirely comfortable with until my second week at placement, and they have become a source of new strength because those friends are the people I am fighting for when I write this blog. Us humble neckbeards and Internet Trolls need to stick together because people want to take everything that makes life fun away from us, and we will fight for our right to party!

If you are struggling to find employment, there may be a course like this in your hometown, which can change your life. If it isn’t, start fighting for it – putting it into every single person’s ear from the welfare office, because you can fight for and find employment and get that second chance at life.

Don’t forget to share this blog on social media, buttons at the bottom of this blog.

And make sure you bookmark my front page and come back regularly to see what I am up to. My most frequented social media accounts are Minds.com and Twitter.

Trolly’s Story

Trolly is the hero the Internet needs, but not the one the Internet deserves. A humble Internet troll who works in a factory for a living, he writes blogs about his thoughts on the world at large.

When Antifa begins its cleansing of the Internet, Trolly knew he had to do something, and he couldn’t just hide behind a computer screen anymore, he needed to fight with all his might to protect free speech!

​Trolly’s Hot Topic – 26/11/2017 – Lindsey Shepard vs Wilfrid Laurier University

Once upon a time, we lived in a culture that many people thought a Post Secondary education was a dream for their family. In fact, many universities offer financial help to first generation post-secondary students, just to bring people into the fold. But with everything that happened in Mizzou and Evergreen College. Evergreen College is so bad Huffington Post has doubled down and deleted the first article on it because even people on the left were embarrassed by the events that happened there. I knew a controversy like that would soon hit Canada because we’re just next door to the US. What happens the United States eventually happens in Canada. Canada’s enormous controversy is Lindsay Shepard playing a Jordan B. Peterson debate from the Agenda to a communications class she was teaching, and that ruffled the feathers of leftist professors because she breached their safe space.

From Here’s the full recording of Wilfrid Laurier reprimanding Lindsay Shepherd for showing a Jordan Peterson video

00:00:56 “SO YOU WEREN’T, LIKE, ONE OF JORDAN PETERSON’S STUDENTS?”

Shepherd: Obviously this person (the complainant) who had an issue did not express it to me, they just went straight to whoever, I don’t know what really happened.

Rambukkana: Just for some additional context so, you came from U of T is that right?

Shepherd: No, SFU.

Rambukkana: From SFU, okay. So you weren’t, like, one of Jordan Peterson’s students?

I can see the narrative they are going to pain Lindsay with, they were going to say here’s a ‘disciple’ of Jordan B. Peterson, who wholly agreed with his stances, and completely ruin her academic career by saying she was just as ‘transphobic’ as he was. Fortunately, Lindsay was a student of Simon Fraser University and was never a student of Jordan B. Peterson so that they couldn’t use that narrative. You’d think they’d be more organised than this. I wouldn’t have made such a rookie error; I would have checked her transcripts and not made huge ass assumptions, proving how much of an ass they were.

Rambukkana: …[Peterson] lectures about critiquing feminism, critiquing trans rights —

Shepherd: I’m familiar. I follow him. But can you shield people from those ideas? Am I supposed to comfort them and make sure that they are insulated away from this? Like, is that what the point of this is? Because to me, that is so against what a university is about. So against it. I was not taking sides. I was presenting both arguments.

Rambukkana: So the thing about this is, if you’re presenting something like this, you have to think about the kind of teaching climate that you’re creating. And this is actually, these arguments are counter to the Canadian Human Rights Code. Even since … C-16, ever since this passed, it is discriminatory to be targeting someone due to their gender identity or gender expression.

Lindsay stood her ground on presenting both sides, but in the world of Social Justice Hegemony, you can’t question orthodoxy. Her Professor went so far to say that she broke the law. I remember when people told me, C-16 can’t get you into trouble for anything, and won’t be used to justify anything. What is her professor saying, you intolerant monster, you broke the law. People using C-16 like this was my primary concern,  forcing their agenda down our throats. Once upon a time, atheists would say to religious people, don’t push your religion down my throat. Isn’t that what trans ‘advocates’ are doing with C-16, they are pushing their wills down our throats by threatening us with legal actions, and social justice inquisition tribunals like this, using C-16!

And they don’t even have that right. C-16 would only apply to someone who was saying we needed to gather up all the Trans people in the world and gas them like Hitler Gassed the Jews, or if we say things like we should use biological weapons on Somalia. Those kinds of extreme language could be considered threats to people’s lives.

From What the Wilfrid Laurier professors got wrong about Bill C-16 and gender identity discrimination

C-16 added gender identity and expressions as a category for what counts under Canada’s hate-crime laws, which include calling for genocide or wilfully inciting hatred toward an identifiable group. The categories of colour, race, religion, national or ethnic origin, age, sex, sexual orientation and mental or physical disability were already on the list of identifiable groups.

So, we have a bunch of professors who come in with an assumption as to who Lindsay was, without checking their assumptions first, who don’t even know what the law really is. When I think of Nathan Rambukkana, I wonder if he should teach. With such a lack of knowledge, and pushing this kind of extreme political agenda – he shouldn’t be a professor at a University. How can a University professor be so misinformed about the law? It seems his career is an open book and he looks like a clown who doesn’t deserve the position of authority he has attained.

I would recommend that Wilfred Laurier fire this guy because he doesn’t seem to have earned his position at all. He is that wrong about the law. And Rambukkana doesn’t even think the students are mature enough to watch a Jordan B. Peterson video without being offended.

Rambukkana: These are very young students, and something of that nature is not appropriate to that age of student, because they don’t have …

Shepherd: 18?

Rambukkana: Yes.

Shepherd: They’re adults.

Rambukkana: Yes, but they’re very young adults. they don’t have the critical toolkit to be able to pick it apart yet. This is one of the things we’re teaching them, so this is why it becomes something that has to be done with a bit more care.

Yeah, according to Rambukkana, the students are old enough to go to Pornhub and watch a Tranny having sex with a man, but are not mature and stable enough to view 5 minutes of Jordan B. Peterson, because he is ‘Literally Hitler’.

Pimlott: I would find it problematic if my tutorial leaders were representing positions that didn’t have any substantial academic credibility to that evidence.

Shepherd: But he’s still a public figure … this was on a TV show. He’s still a public figure.

Pimlott: He’s a public figure, and a lot of people there like (American white supremacist) Richard Spencer of, I don’t like calling them alt-right, it gives them too much legitimacy, but Richard Spencer, right? The Nazis actually used, this is a historic—issues around the free speech idea in the 1920s in Weimar Germany as an issue around which which is what they’re using now. We know that someone like Richard Spencer is using theories and ideas that don’t have any academic credibility. He’s a public figure. But in terms of, if we introduce someone, we give them greater credibility in a certain condition. I agree that there are public figures out there that bring people, uh, bring hatred, target groups and if you look at statistically the degree of suicide attempts of trans people, young people, it’s the highest of any group in society. And, you know, it’s, you go through — Indigenous people — and so on. There are things that don’t have academic credibility and I just don’t think—I personally think I have some problems, I have no problems with the fact that these things are out there and people are going to engage them but we have to think of the atmosphere that we also create for the learning process.

Wow, Didn’t you know, Jordan B. Peterson is doing what the Nazis did in the 1920s. Yeah, you read that right. Jordan B. Peterson is literally a Nazi now. The level of political discourse is disgusting now, that any idea that lies outside of the realm of social justice gets this kind of personal attacks.

They are not discussing the merits of Jordan B. Peterson or Lindsay’s points, they are vehemently on the attack against her and him, trying to create a ‘safe space’ for the LGBT community over something problematic. I’ll lay it out for you. Real Transgendered people, who are transitioning between biologically male to female, or vice versa, will prefer to be called the pronouns of the gender they are transitioning into – so they want to be called she/her or he/him, and most people will accommodate for that. What Jordan B. Peterson is worried about is policing the language of these ‘non-binary’ people. You know those Tall Pansexual flirty wood sprites who want to be called They/Them/Their or whatever silly pronouns they want to use. I can objectively prove that I am biologically male and that my fiancé is biologically female because of our bodies, but how do you objectively prove something like someone being a trans fluid dragon troll?

I guess I am transphobic too, amirite Dr Herbert Pimlot. I will not listen to the https://ageofshitlords.com/list-of-all-tumblr-genders-so-far GenderQueer Demi-Boy Polyamourous people. That’s made up stuff that people will use to feel important. In reality, biological sex is something that can be proven, though they have their ‘arguments’ against that, and people transitioning can be proven, but their assertions of being ‘genderqueer’ are all in their imaginations, and should probably stay there.

Rambukkana: Do you understand how what happened was contrary to, sorry Adria, what was the policy?

Joel: Gendered and Sexual Violence.

Rambukkana: — Gendered and Sexual Violence Policy. Do you understand how —

Shepherd: Sorry, what did I violate in that policy.

Joel: Um, so, gender-based violence, transphobia, in that policy. Causing harm, um, to trans students by, uh, bringing their identity as invalid. Their pronouns as invalid — potentially invalid.

Shepherd: So I caused harm?

Joel: — which is, under the Ontario Human Rights Code a protected thing so something that Laurier holds as a value.

Shepherd: Ok, so by proxy me showing a YouTube video I’m transphobic and I caused harm and violence? So be it. I can’t do anything to control that.

Rambukkana: Ok, so that’s not something that you have an issue with? The fact that that happened? Are you sorry that it happened?

Shepherd: I know in my heart, and I expressed to the class, that I’m not transphobic and if any of them — again, I don’t know what they said — but I don’t think I gave away any kind of political position of mine. I remained very neutral, and uh—

Rambukkana: —that’s kind of the problem.

You know you have an orthodoxy when you can’t be impartial. The most significant problem they had with her is that she was neutral on their views. You are either with them or against them. There is no middle ground, their Social Justice Inquisition Tribunal completely reveals it. Lindsey may have been red pilled before this, but this has undoubtedly exposed her to the truth that her professors are intolerant leftists and they will not allow anybody to challenge their ideas.

Lindsay was smart. She went through the entire tribunal recording the meeting, so that she had the ability to defend herself by presenting everything to the media later. And the National Post and The Globe and Mail ran with the story, revealing how these brainwashed professors put her through hell. Since it all broke, the University has written a letter of apology to Lindsey, because she shouldn’t have gone through all of that. But it makes you wonder, had she not recorded the meeting and provided the recording to the media, would anything had happened about this. It would have been silently sweeping under the rug, and they would have ruined Lindsay’s academic career.

But social justice is still angry about this.

From Campus LGBT group: Wilfrid Laurier isn’t going far enough to silence ‘climate of transphobia’

Though Wilfrid Laurier University has apologized to Lindsay Shepherd, the university’s Rainbow Centre appears to be endorsing the disciplinary action originally taken against the teaching assistant, and suggesting the school isn’t doing enough to combat “profound violence” against transgender people.

“In the face of recent media attention, we feel it is our responsibility to speak out against the climate of transphobia that is being fostered at Laurier,” reads a statement released Tuesday by the Wilfrid Laurier University Rainbow Centre, a service within the school’s diversity and equity office that offers support to queer and trans students.

In this culture war, where everybody is offended perpetually over everything, we are never going to see a break. Lindsay’s forethought of recording the meeting, and the media and international community pressuring Wilfred Laurier University into apologising to Lindsay is a significant victory, but the Rainbow Center is shouting from the rooftops that the university should silence Lindsay and that there is ‘profound’ violence against Transgendered people. The war will continue on,but I am satisfied that we won a victory against these forces.

Thanks for reading, and have a great week guys.

Don’t forget to share this blog on social media, buttons at the bottom of this blog.

Make sure you bookmark my front page and follow my work on, Minds.com and Twitter.

Trolly’s week in review – 19/11/2017 – Al Franken and the hypocrisy of the left!

This week has unquestionably been very entertaining. From Al Franken accused of sexual assault, then apologizing. If you read the story, man, he is such a child. He was doing immature shit like drawing devil horns on the pictures she was signing for troops, and doing petty things to get revenge. But the model has forgiven him. Al seems to have a lack of self-control when it comes to being rejected. Even Salon.com is demanding his resignation, being yet another male ‘feminist’ who ‘wanted to fight for women’, who ended up being a creepy bastard. Of course, Salon brings up Roy Moore and brings up something I want to talk about, the difference between listening and believe, and trust but verify when it comes to the justice system.

From Al Franken must go: It’s the right way to help women and protect Democrats

If there weren’t photographic evidence to back Tweeden’s claims, it would be easy to dismiss this whole thing as a stunt designed to distract the media from allegations against Moore and to give cover to Republicans who want to continue supporting him. Now any Republican who is asked about Moore can simply deflect the question by invoking Franken and suggesting that both sides do it.

Yes, there is photographic evidence, which is why we need to take Al Franken’s case seriously. I’m not a ‘feelings’ person, and I will never be one. When someone can destroy a person’s life over one false rape allegation, I want proof before I will rally with someone who claims someone sexually assaulted them. It’s called due process and due diligence. If you are condemning someone who is only facing charges, you are part of a Simpson’s Witch hunt. It is better ten guilty men go free than one innocent man is wrongly convicted. This is what the ideal of innocent until proven guilty means, and with feminism and it’s hate on for ‘rape’ and their ‘listen and believe’, this ideal is constantly being pressured. Al, there is photographic evidence that you do those things, so I am going to rally with Leeann Tweeden about this, you did wrong.

Roy Moore is a he said/she said thing. First, he has been a judge. If these sexual assaults had been happening, why was there no complaints to the Bar? These kinds of allegations can have powerful repercussions, so why wasn’t any allegations made when he was a judge, getting him disbarred. The only controversies he was involved in is taking a stand on the ten commandments being in Alabama Judiciary Building, and suggesting judges not honour same-sex marriages in Alabama. That is until now.

The rape allegations coming out now, and not 30 years ago when he was a judge doesn’t make any sense at all, if Judge more had been raping women left, right, and centre, why didn’t they get him disbarred because he would not have been impartial during rape trials. You’d think these feminist-minded people would ensure every woman who was traumatised by rape wouldn’t have to face him in court. But it wasn’t when he was a judge, overseeing rape cases when they started their allegations, it was when he went up for a Senate run, making it seem like a dirty trick of the Democrats. And since you know my worldview, I’d rather see ten rapists go free than seeing a family like Jay Cheshire and his mom commit suicide over false allegations. If there is no proof, I’m not jumping to conclusions at all.

Especially since Roy Moore is saying, he is innocent of the accusations people are making right now. Some people may say, man up, accept this, and move on. I don’t know if he did, and there has been no history of these accusations, unlike other Hollywood celebrities.

While I am going to be on the record that I am going to want to see justice done, where protecting the innocent is more important than punishing the guilty, I am not without compassion for those who have been through the abuse of men. This week, I was moved by the events of Adiba, a Yazidi woman, who was a sex slave of ISIS for over two years. She was raped, beaten and tortured by six men after ISIS overran her village. The disturbing actions that ISIS always does to Yazidi women are why free Yazidi women become some of the most skilled and fearless soldiers against ISIS. They don’t care if they die because if ISIS captures them, they will live years of suffering as a sex slave. And there is western women who willingly join ISIS, over Facebook chats. What a joke our culture is.

The story I read solidified how much I do not like Islam this week. People say that Islam has nothing to do with ISIS, but they call themselves the Islamic State for a reason. And 7 percent of Muslims think their methods are sometimes or often justified. Islam is less a religion and more of a supremacist movement that demands everything be exactly the most extreme believers want, which is why they probably hate Yazidi people.

From Raped, beaten and tortured: Former ISIS sex slave on her journey to new life in Canada

The Yazidis are a Kurdish minority group of around 700,000 people targeted for their ancient religious beliefs, which combine elements of Hinduism, Judaism, Christianity and Islam. They became known as heretics, and faced years of oppression and threats of ethnic cleansing because of it.

If this kind of Ethnic cleansing doesn’t show that Islam doesn’t want other competing ideas against it, I don’t know what will convince people. Apostates, people who leave the faith, are to be murdered. If you convert to Christianity, become an atheist or agnostic and so many things are death sentences in Islamic Majority countries. ISIS and other terrorist organisations will murder people engaged in any different minority belief system. When people say Sir John A. MacDonald is a ‘White Supremacist’ trying to eradicate Indigenous culture, I laugh, because Islam would have completely wiped out Indigenous culture. Islamists only leave two choices for any non-believer, join Islam or die.

And the left is learning these lessons well from Muslims. If you don’t tow the line on their ‘diversity demands’, the Left’s sharia law, then you are going to be ousted out of your job.

From Apple Diversity Chief Forced Out After Saying White Men Can Also Be ‘Diverse’

Silicon Valley’s disdain for its mostly white, mostly male tech workforce has reached absurd new heights.

The New York Post is reporting that, after just six months on the job, Apple Diversity Chief Denise Young Smith, who was named vice president of diversity and inclusion in May, has resigned her post after making a “controversial” comment last month during a summit in Bogota, Colombia.

What was Young’s crime? She insinuated that “diversity” can still exist among a group of white men because of their different life experiences.

“There can be 12 white, blue-eyed, blond men in a room and they’re going to be diverse too because they’re going to bring a different life experience and life perspective to the conversation,” the inaugural diversity chief said.

The left is becoming more and more authoritarian, much more so than the right. It is one impressive ‘political movement of peace’, just like Islam. They use the court of public opinion to assassinate your character and force you out of any job. People ask me, why I do this, and I say, someone has to stand against this force. You can’t fire someone for having a non-criminal opinion that you don’t like. If she was all like, yo, white men should white out black people, like myself, and become the master race; I could understand that. But the idea that 12 people with 12 different life experiences can see the world in a diverse way even if they are of the same ethnicity is ‘heresy’ to them, and she needed to go.

You cannot create a world like that, where people are afraid of say anything, be it Denise Young Smith for stating something truthful, or Lindsay Shepherd for showing a Jordan B. Peterson video. If you stifle free speech like this, there can be no dialogue and progress. If your idea of progress is so fragile that you need to prevent discourse that disagrees with it, then your idea of development is not progress, but regression. I will stand against your attacks on freedom of speech because you have no power over me and you cannot bully me.

And we are winning victories against this excessive political correctness and media manipulation. With victories like Brexit and Trump, taking a stand has helped us. Which is why the media hates Trump so much. They want to establish a Russian connection so much, people will do anything to link them.

From Trump Jr. messaged with WikiLeaks during 2016 campaign

WASHINGTON — U.S. President Donald Trump’s oldest son released a series of private Twitter exchanges between himself and WikiLeaks during and after the 2016 election, including pleas from the website to publicize its leaks.

Donald Trump Jr.’s release of the messages on Twitter came hours after The Atlantic first reported them Monday. In the exchanges — some of them around the time that the website was releasing the stolen emails from Democrat Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman — WikiLeaks praises his father’s positive comments about WikiLeaks and asks Trump Jr. to release his father’s tax returns to the site.

The revelations are sure to increase calls in Congress to have Trump Jr. testify publicly as part of several committee probes into Russian interference in the 2016 election. And they add a new element to the investigations that have been probing for months whether Trump’s campaign colluded in any way with the Russian government.

Yes, CTV news is still covering the Russia, Russia, Russia story. Even if there is more evidence that Russia would have been Clinton’s cornerFrom day one of the Donald Trump Jr. and the Russian Lawyer story, I could smell that it was a setup. How much was faked? #Pissgate is not real people, come one. Nobody should believe it. Basically the Russian Collusion story is Trump was investigating Hillary’s corruption, and so he is a criminal.

But it shows that the left and the mainstream politics want to shut down all dissenting voices, and just pass them off as ‘racist, sexist, and homophobic’. They can take those things and shove it up their asses.

Well, that’s my week in review guys. Thanks for reading and have a great week.

Don’t forget to share this blog on social media, buttons at the bottom of this blog.

Make sure you bookmark my front page, and follow my work on, Minds.com and Twitter.

Trolly’s Shitpost Saturday – 18/11/2017 – The Sarkeesian Effect

We live in a whacked out world, where a man says the slightest ‘sexist’ comment will ensure the hashtag #metoo, where a simple sexual encounter means you were sexually assaulted and had sexually assaulted women. Feminism and social justice have turned this world upside down, where we all walk on eggshells. The newest allegations are coming out from the sets of SuperGirl and Arrow.

From ‘Supergirl’ Melissa Benoist calls harassment allegations ‘heartbreaking’

 

Supergirl star Melissa Benoist has spoken out in the wake of sexual harassment accusations against co-showrunner Andrew Kreisberg, who has been suspended pending an investigation by Warner Bros.

“I am a woman who leads a show that supports equality and feminism, empowerment and fighting for what is right. I have always tried to conduct myself this way personally, as well,” Benoist said in a statement posted Sunday night on Twitter. “Sadly, the show and my career are a part of an industry that doesn’t always mirror these sentiments.”

In a Variety story Friday, 15 women and four men detailed years of alleged misconduct by Kreisberg, including frequent touching without permission, asking for massages from female staff members and sexualized comments about women’s appearances.

Welcome to the new trope Andrew, male ‘feminists’ are secretly sexual abusers. You’re just another man who went too far, and we need to punish you. You touched people, you commented on people’s appearances, and you asked women to massage you – that’s just wrong, how dare you try to talk to people you thought were attractive, shame, shame shame.

You know me guys. Usually, I hate Hollywood, for creating a monopoly on entertainment, but here’s where I have to show the double standards.

I smiled and laughed when I read this sign because it is just as sarcastic and witty as I am. It’s one of the reasons why I still watch SuperGirl. A piece of advice, that show’s writing is so bad; the show will not last long. The writers are shit.

And this wasn’t the only Hollywood/DC sexual assault allegation this week. We have Al Franken!

People like Al Franken is why I hate Hollywood. These entitled pieces of crap think they can do whatever they want, but hide it be ‘fighting for the ladies and equality’ later. It is absolutely disgusting.

The goal posts of feminism and ‘gender’ equality are always moving. Feminists consider a casual flirt, which Andrew seems to be ‘guilty’, is sexual harassment now. What isn’t sexual harassment anymore. Well, according to Canadian PM JT, we have a long way to go for Gender Equality.

From Women empowerment a key driver of successful economy, says Trudeau

 

“Now the word feminist still scares a few people but it still means recognizing that men and women are equal and should be equal,” he said.

He also said, but was not quoted, that we have a long way to achieve gender equality. I would like to ask Justin Trudeau, if we have laws to ensure women get equal pay, the ability to vote, the ability to get whatever job they want and to do whatever they want, how much do we need to do for women for them to achieve equality?

Section 15 ensures the equal protection and benefit of the law “without discrimination […] based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.”

Court decisions have expanded this list to prohibit discrimination on other grounds, such as citizenship, marital status and sexual orientation; decisions have also recognized that multiple grounds of discrimination may intersect in particular cases.

Section 28 guarantees that all rights covered in the Charter apply equally to men and women.

The Canadian Human Rights Act of 1977 states that all Canadians have the right to equality, equal opportunity, fair treatment, and an environment free of discrimination on the basis of sex, sexual orientation, marital status and family status. It protects Canadians from discrimination when they are employed by or receive services from:

the federal government;

First Nations governments; or

private companies that are regulated by the federal government like banks, trucking companies, broadcasters and telecommunications companies.

The CHRA created the Canadian Human Rights Commission to investigate and settle complaints of discrimination, and refer them to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal for a decision or settlement.

Other legislative acts that are important to women and equality rights are the Employment Equity Act and the Public Sector Equitable Compensation Act.

We all have the same rights under the law Trudeau, so you’re not making any sense. I know you like virtue signalling about Feminism, but we don’t need to do anything more to ensure women are equal partners in our culture on a legal level. Maybe there are a few people who need some attitude adjustments, and there are very few who do, but we don’t need to fight for ‘equality’ under the law anymore. Everybody is equal and have legal measures to follow to prosecute people who treat them with discrimination.

But the world of social justice wasn’t just interested in the world of ‘sexism’, it was really offended by Sir. John A. MacDonald for being a racist this week as well.

From ‘Anti-racist’ group says it covered John A. Macdonald statue in red substance

 

The John A. Macdonald monument in downtown Montreal was covered head-to-toe with what appears to be red paint early Sunday.

The vandalism took place ahead of a demonstration that saw hundreds take to the city’s streets to denounce racism and Bill 62, the province’s religious neutrality law requiring anyone receiving or providing public services to have an uncovered face.

Video posted online by a group of self-described “anti-colonial anti-racists” shows a colourful substance being sprayed onto the statue of Canada’s first prime minister at Place du Canada.

Yup, here we go again. Sir John A. MacDonald may have been the most famous drunk in Canada, but he wasn’t just a renowned drunk, he was a white supremacist who was out to destroy people of diversity because he was a colonialist.

Let’s look at the main post of the protestors.

From Grande manifestation contre la haine et le racisme

 

MONTREAL, November 12, 2017 — On the eve of an important demonstration against hate and racism in Montreal, a group of anonymous local anti-colonial, anti-racist, anti-capitalist activists have successfully defaced the historical monument to Canada’s first Prime Minister, John A. Macdonald, located in downtown at Place du Canada.

Oh, anti-capitalists. I guess this group hates the idea that working longer, harder, smarter, and better than anybody else should get paid more because that is what communists think. Because people want their employers or customers to pay them for the hard work they do, these people are officially morons. The more employers reward workers who are exceeding expectations, the harder, faster, smarter and better we will work beceause there is a benefit in doing their best. If you don’t like it, I suggest you move to North Korea or Venezuela and enjoy losing weight on the communist diet.

Of course any group who describes itself as ‘anti-colonial, racist, and capitalist’ is Antifa. Again, their criminal activity is free speech because Sir John A. MacDonald is a ‘butchering white supremacist’.

The individuals responsible for this action are not affiliated with today’s anti-racist demonstration (www.manif12novembre.com) but have decided to target the John A. Macdonald statue as a clear symbol of colonialism, racism and white supremacy.

Here we go again; everything is white supremacy. White people need to beg forgiveness because we had the technology to spread our culture around the world, creating the world we see today. We went out and created a culture where cultures could trade with each other, massively enriching our lives. But doing that was racism, colonialism, and white supremacy. You are a special little snowflake.

The action today is inspired in part by movements in the USA to target public symbols of white supremacy for removal, such as Confederate statues. It’s also motivated by decolonial protests, like the “Rhodes Must Fall” movement in South Africa. As well, we are directly inspired by protests by anti-colonial activists – both Indigenous and non-Indigenous – against John. A. Macdonald, particularly in Kingston, Ontario, Macdonald’s hometown. We also note efforts elsewhere in the Canadian state to rename the schools named after Macdonald, including a resolution by the Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario who denounced Macdonald as the ‘architect of genocide against Indigenous people.’ The defacing of the Macdonald Monument is also appropriate in the context of the whitewashing of Canadian history this year during the “Canada 150” celebrations, and various calls to action, including the ‘375+150 = Bullshit’ graffiti action this summer.

If this doesn’t say that cultural Marxism hasn’t thoroughly infiltrated our culture, I don’t know what will convince you. They were inspired by the movements in the USA to remove ‘confederate statues’, while at the same time, they are shouting from the rooftops about Colonialism and ‘genocide’ against Indigenous people, despite the fact, there are over 1,000,000 indigenous people living in Canada, around 5% of our population. The Indian act wasn’t an act of wipe out anybody; it was an act to try to create stability. If people didn’t know, Canada and the US weren’t on the best of terms at the time, so ensuring the Indigenous people’s cooperation and assimilation was foremost on MacDonald’s mind at the time. Indigenous people who weren’t Canadians could become an ally of the United States.

John A. Macdonald was a white supremacist. He directly contributed to the genocide of Indigenous peoples with the creation of the brutal residential schools system, as well as other measures meant to destroy native cultures and traditions. He was racist and hostile towards non-white minority groups in Canada, openly promoting the preservation of a so-called “Aryan” Canada. He passed laws to exclude people of Chinese origin. He was responsible for the hanging of Métis martyr Louis Riel. Macdonald’s statue belongs in a museum, not as a monument taking up public space in Montreal.

First, there is still over 1,000,000 Indigenous people in Canada. If he intended to commit genocide, there wouldn’t be. Second, not allowing people of specific origins to immigrate into your country is not racism, it is called planning your society. Third, there was no talk of an ‘Aryan’ Canada. Plus, Louis Riel story has mixed reactions. He did rebel against the government, making him a traitor to Canada, as it was emerging as a nation. We were not on friendly terms with the US, so it isn’t far from the imagination that the US could have exploited this politically at the time, so Sir John A. MacDonald did what he needed to do to ensure peace, order, and good government.

This political correctness trying to attack the histories of our nations for racism creates a cultural backdrop where we celebrate things that are genuinely oppressive.

From The hijab-wearing Barbie who’s become an Instagram star

Barbie has had another makeover. This time as a hijab-wearing Muslim. It was only last month that Mattel gave Barbie a dramatic transformation with a variety of skin tones and different body types, including adding curves to her impossibly slender frame. Now a Nigerian medical scientist has taken Instagram by storm since she began posting images of a hijab-wearing Barbie doll a few weeks ago.

Yeah, because everything has to be about the religion of peace. When people say white English and other European cultures were ‘colonial’ and attempted to ‘eradicate’ entire societies, I laugh, because they sure didn’t do a great job doing that. Those ‘eradicated’ cultures are still with us in some form or another, practice the things they have always exercised, and we have elevated them to our technology and social progress.

Islam isn’t as forgiving towards the differing cultures in the countries they have complete power. Every single county they invade, and yes it is an invasion, what starts as a minority eventually becomes an Islamic majority.

What people mistake for a religion, is really a supremacy movement. Those ‘chosen by Allah’ to spread his message must go out and dominate all the world. They do not want to work with the west; they want to subvert it. Islam doesn’t care about your skin colour, but they only think white women are good for one thing – you guessed it. They will convert you to their ideology with brute force while denying the rights of LGBT people, because they even think it is better to kill an LGBT person than to allow them to live. Yeah, they will fit right in with our tolerant culture, so lets have a Barbie who wears a Hijab!

Well that’s my shit post for this week.

Have an amazing week guys.

If you want to follow all my work, you follow me on two places, Minds.com and Twitter.

And don’t forget to bookmark my front page to check for future blogs.