One of the most important things I learned in the past seven years is how important having a partner means to me. I live for The Purple Horse. She is at the centre of every decision I make. When I have a terrible day, she is there to hold me and tell me that I am the best. She is my help as I live on Earth. I wouldn’t be here today, writing this blog if it wasn’t for her. Someone wrote in a book that it is not good for a man to be alone. Later, another person said there would be a day where people would be engaged in unnatural affections. Whether it is a sex robot, or watching copious amounts of porn, or having children from artificial wombs, MGTOW is focusing on ‘solutions’ to the ‘woman problem’. It shows the epitome of delving into strange affections and where that can take us.
These things do not offend me, or worry me because I know all these things must happen. I know that Marxism needs to raise its head one last time for the people to destroy it once and for all in a single hour. Let Marxist professors try to radicalise their students into their repugnant religion, for the blind lead the blind in the world of academia. Let the women referee men’s behaviour, making men feel like they there is something defective about them, or leading men to raise up against this foolishness. Men are not ‘defective women’. Let men seek lifelong friendships and living arrangements with each other in ‘bromances’, men they can sit back, drink a few beers, talk about how shitty their lives are, people who they can joke about ‘objectifying’ some new hot starlet on TV or movies. More men and making this choice according to a new study from the University of Bedfordshire in Britain.
‘What happens if these bromantic relationships really take off… Women actually just become the sexual fulfillers of men and nothing else. That’s the worrying aspect’
Well, I have to say that Feminism did this. When it took what is natural, like the affection and attraction men and women have for each other, which is best suited to creating a stable, functional home for a husband and wife and their children, feminism messed around with it with the ‘sexual revolution’, leading men to choose something more stable to grow more. Eventually, men would say, if you can’t live with them, but you can’t live without them, you find a way to live without them. Men are very rational and can look at women with a utilitarian purpose – like sexual fulfillers, while renting a place with their best friends, all working at their jobs, coming home to play some Halo or Call of Duty, and eating some Pizza. It’s 2017, and no man is really homophobic anymore, and even gay jokes are water off a duck’s back. Who cares anymore? If women want to be left alone to become the next ‘kick-ass CEO’ of a Fortune 500 company, then men will leave her to her own devices. We’re not going to stand in her way.
So women are now worried that men are more likely to seek other men than to live under the thumb of a woman who finds their behaviour ‘problematic’, who doesn’t want to commit, because she wants to have her career, and fight against the ‘wage gap’. That’s why they are worried about sex robots. I’m not for robots myself. It is completely unnatural. Our affections and attractions, as I stated above, is to have a natural relationship. Men and Women who have families have the most fulfilling lives. Having children is a sign of optimism because you are saying the world is going to be better when you have a child, and pessimistic adults have fewer children. And men in despair will choose porn or sex robots over leaping in faith and being in a relationship.
The rise of the intimate “bromance” as a new form of friendship has liberated young men from the stifling bigotries of homophobia, but it imperils young women who are increasingly regarded as little more than targets of sexual attraction, according to new sociological research.
The bromance may not be the progressive expression of enlightened masculinity, as it is sometimes described and portrayed in movies, said Adam White of the University of Bedfordshire in Britain.
Fuck your ‘progressivism’ and your fucking cultural Marxism. Your ‘progressivism’ has done this. When the Duluth Model treats every man as the only abuser in a relationship when it’s really a 60/40 split – both men and women in relationships will initiate abuse on each other, but it is always the man who gets arrested, and Title IX is indiscriminately ruining young men’s lives, with every false rape allegation against them, in Star Chamber like vengence scenarios, Is it a wonder why men will enter a ‘bromance’, living with their best friends, kicking back and enjoying their lives, instead of the constant worry of a woman destroying his life. If I didn’t know that truth that men need women so we can bring the best out of each other, I would undoubtedly live that comfortable lifestyle. A more laborious life makes strong people though, so fuck them.
So now the progressives are finding, whatever men do is problematic. If men live with women, he might abuse her physically or sexually, because the Duluth model says men are monsters. If men live with other men, that is also bad for women, because men find it easier to be around other men than they find it to be with women, and women will only be around to ‘sexually gratify’ men. Make up your damn minds, you Cultural Marxists. The only consistency of either statement is you don’t like things men do.
Rather, it may be a regressive development, with especially worrying results for women. His research, based on interviews with male undergraduate students, concluded that men saw their female romantic partners as judgmental, and as “the primary regulators of their behaviour.” This led to a generalised disdain for women, and a view of romance in which men feel they are “constantly posturing and self-monitoring, not only to achieve desired heterosexual sex but to prevent relationship destruction.”
Geez, guys don’t want to cuck themselves so much that they feel like they can’t be themselves to keep a relationship going. It’s almost like men have to be ‘completely self-aware’ just to maintain a relationship because women are tyrants over the men’s behaviours. Considering this is out of a university, I wonder how many of these ‘girlfriends’ are gender studies students, learning all about toxic whiteness and masculinity, and when a guy steps over that ‘line’, they are completely fucked over because he’s ‘abusive’ to her.
A key theme of the bromance, on the other hand, was the freedom to express themselves without judgment and to engage in emotional intimacy without fear.
The rise of the bromance “is very, very good for men,” White said. It offers young men the opportunity for, as the research found, “elevated emotional stability, enhanced emotional disclosure, social fulfilment and better conflict resolution, compared to the emotional lives they shared with girlfriends.”
When it comes down to it, it looks like the best way men can fight depression, suicide, and so many other problems is just hanging out with other men, and even living with them. Men can’t always be ‘micromanaged’ by judgmental partners and expect to be healthy. It sounds like the good ol’ clans system. Men worked with each other on a personal level, not in an 8*8 cube.
This study could be reimagined to say that women need to work on themselves more, because if men find men better to live with, the problem is not men, but women. It seems these ‘girlfriends’ are not self-reflective, realizing they are putting stress on their men so much, that their men are more willing to hang out with the bros than spend time with them. If women want to have men spend more time with them, they need to start to be more of a supportive girlfriend than a referee over their behaviour. As Pavlov proved, animals in any activity that has a reward is going to learn how to navigate that much faster than an animal in an activity that is punishment based. If women have become ‘judgmental’ and hanging with the bros is fun, what do you think men will chose, based upon Pavlov’s findings?
This study just concludes that the dynamics between men and women are so fucked up in the west, that men find hanging out with dudes so much more socially satisfying than living with a woman. And if the ‘progressives’ don’t like it, they can take a long walk off a short pier. You made that bed, go lie in it. This is your grand ‘Feminist’ Utopia. It was so successful in creating a wedge between men and women that men don’t even want to live with women.
Thanks for reading guys, and have a great day!
The share buttons at the bottom of the blog to help other people find my blog, and it is fantastic to see someone share my blog on social media.